Muslim Civil Liberties....or else

Submitted by Rick (United States), Oct 11, 2006 at 10:11

Prohibition was stricken down in the Constitution of the United States. This is not a local ordance. It is constitutional law. One cannot drink in public but the sale and use of liquor can be understood almost in constitutional terms. Is the city of Minneapolis going to now make exceptions to the constitution of the United States for Muslims? Is there any greater act of dhimmitude for the United States?

The officials who make exceptions for these Muslim drivers should be sued by the US government as creating regulations in opposition to the US Constitution and thus depriving US citizens of their lawful rights..

Let those who support dhimmitude pay a steep price.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".