69 million page views

agenda, fact or analysis?

Reader comment on item: The 751 No-Go Zones of France
in response to reader comment: agenda and fact

Submitted by daniel (France), Dec 4, 2006 at 20:20

I don't believe I suggested that all contributors to this column with first-hand experience support Dr. Pipes' analysis. From what I can gather, as evidenced in my previous comments, there's a fairly even split between those who wholeheartedly endorse it (Johnson, Jo M) and those who discredit it (Standhope, Murphy), though in all honesty I must admit Messrs. Standhope's and Murphy's comments are better substantiated.

I myself have some direct knowledge (see "caveat"), as I happen to live just a few streets from one of the Zones on the list (which I honestly don't mind walking to on my way to work), my wife also taught in another for several years. My own personal experience, which I don't consider to be adequate when placed along lengthier statistical studies, leads me to believe that Dr. Pipes' portrayal, while somewhat alarmist, is not altogether ill-founded.

To support my point of view (that there are indeed lawless "sensitive" zones in France, where the French state exercises only limited control), which I readily admit is nothing more than a layman's educated opinion, I have provided links to recent articles in the French press. I don't know what studies you base your own comments on, but I would be sincerely interested in taking account of them as well.

On the whole I would agree with quite a few of your previous comments, here are a few reactions (i.e. mainly disagreement or qualification) to the latest series :

>>Lack of religious observance rather than religious fundamentalism would also typify the people who live in these places.

I'm afraid my own personal contacts would suggest to me that most are caught somewhere in the middle, neither radical fundamentalists nor total apostates, merely sympathizers with a personal distaste for sectarian violence but willing to excuse certain forms more easily than others. Again, if you have hard facts to indicate otherwise, I'm open to be proven wrong.

>>However, if there is one big difference with the US, It is not in the number of Moslems in the respective populations, but in the scale of the problem itself.

It seems to me that the proportion of Mulims and the scale of the problem are both major differences compared to the US.

>>In relation to every single indicator mentioned above, (and adding in illegitimacy, violent homicide, and rape), the US is in a completely different and worse league.

I'll trust you on this one. Not having spent enough years in the US to have any first-hand experience, all I really know is what I read in the papers. I've driven through some squalid areas around Buffalo or Philadelphia while in the States, I can't say they were that much worse than what I'm accustomed to around Paris, but I'm not aware of the statistical indicators that you refer to.

>> One thing is also clear. ZUS are very certainly policed. The most frequent complaints relate not to the absence of policing, but to the alleged over-policing of the poorer suburbs of large French cities - and the often over-enthusiasm of the police in the use of firearms.

This isn't actually all that clear. A frequent tactic in some "sensitive" zones is to call in the police (or even the Fire Department), on reports of car burnings or a break-in, in order to ambush them. In some cases the "complaints" that you allude to are a reflection of the fact that police officers are seldom present in some of the worst areas, so that whenever they are forced to intervene their operations take on a commando-type aspect, and are experienced as such by residents. I remember learning during last year's riots that the ratio of police to inhabitants is some 2 (or even 3?) times higher in Paris proper than in the suburbs, where the needs are of course much greater. Unless I'm completely uninformed, firearm use or abuse by police is not at all as much of a problem with French police as in the US, although there was one such incident recently between a police officer and neo-fascist football fans after the PSG-Tel Aviv game. The investigation is still ongoing, so it's too soon to say if this was a case of legitimate defense or not.

http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,1-0@2-3242,36-838488,0.html?xtor=RSS-3208

>>In fact, the one common denominator connecting most of the very few French citizens who have become involved with Al Qaeda and the like is that they became radicalized abroad - usually in the UK.

You're probably right on this one. The UK is undoubtedly a hotbed of Islamic radicalization in Europe.

>>One interesting and quirky statistic: families of Observant Catholics, Observant Moslems, and Orthodox Jews in France all display similar birth-rates which are significantly higher than their apostate co-religionists.

Right again (although I still don't know where you get your statistics, or what "quirky" number you are referring to). When one considers that the proportion of the religiously observant among "Muslims" appears to be higher than the percentage of observant Catholics (albeit this is a higher percentage among a minority group), and the overall Jewish population is even lower, this tends to distort the birthrate you referred to in a previous post, which at approximately 1.9,

>>see : http://www.insee.fr/fr/ffc/chifcle_fiche.asp?ref_id=CMPTEF02215&tab_id=37

although well above the pan-European average, remains significantly below the ~2.1 birthrate necessary to maintain demographic stability. In addition, the average age of observant Catholics (at any Mass in any Catholic parish I've ever had the pleasure to attend) seems well above reproductive age.

I don't have any reliable statistics to back this up since official inventories of religious practice are unfortunately illegal in France. There are various estimations out there, depending on who you want to believe, so it would be nice to have some standardized numbers to go by in order to know exactly what we're talking about. Here's what "Wikipédia" has to say about the question :

La population musulmane est maintenant estimée par le ministère de l'Intérieur entre 5 et 6 millions au sein d'une population métropolitaine d'environ 63 millions d'habitants. 1,5 million d'entre eux seraient de nationalité française. Il ne s'agit cependant que d'une estimation, puisque le recensement des fidèles d'une religion est interdit par la loi française depuis une loi de 1872. Beaucoup de sociologues pensent que ce nombre ne reflète pas la réalité, et comptent plutôt une population de 8 millions de musulmans sur le territoire français (comparés aux 12 à 20 millions dans l'Union européenne). (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_en_France)

As I've already pointed out, among the 4 to 8 million "Muslims" in France there are quite a few immigrants of North African origin who may or may not identify with or practice the Islamic religion, let alone subscribe to any sort of totalitarian ideology.

Most observers would agree that French "Muslims" are generally more observant than French "Catholics", but this is difficult to quantify for the aforementioned reasons. Given that the INSEE evaluates regular religious practice in the general population at approximately 11.7% (14% for women, 9.4% for men), all religions included

>>see : http://www.insee.fr/fr/ffc/chifcle_fiche.asp?ref_id=NATCCF05502&tab_id=452

and if Le Figaro is correct that religious practice among "Catholics" is approximately 8%

>>see : http://www.lefigaro.fr/france/20060605.FIG000000149_l_inexorable_erosion_de_l_europe_catholique.html

this would put the average for "Muslims" at about 45%, if we assume that the French population is approximately 90% "Catholic" and 10% "Muslim" (.08×.90+.45×.10=11.7).

This calculation is slightly off of course, since it doesn't account for other minorities such as Buddhists, Jews, Orthodox Christians etc., but since agnostics and atheists of all origins are already factored into the INSEE statistics, is must be somewhat realistic. Taking the higher INSEE estimate of 20% occasional religious practice in the general population would only increase the theoretical percentage of observant "Muslims", unless a higher figure can be found for "Catholics". This is nothing but informed mathematical guesswork, but it's the best I can do until such a time as French law allows official religious statistics to be determined. It doesn't tell us why in the INSEE study whatever "Muslims" were surveyed chose to identify themselves as such, or what brand of "Islam" they follow. It does tend to support your statement that "most French Muslims are apostate" or that "lack of religious observance rather than religious fundamentalism would also typify the people who live in these places" but only by a ratio of 55% to 45%.

At any rate, the higher birthrate in France is an encouraging, albeit all too recent, development, regardless of what ethnic origin our new compatriots are from. Although they will certainly have some future significance, birthrate statistics aren't actually very useful in commenting on current ideological trends. Birthrate statistics are interesting, but how do you account for schoolchildren, born in France, with jus soli French citizenship, who continue to identify themselves as "Algerian", "Moroccan" or "Turkish" ? This doesn't tell us anything about their religious practice, but it does suggest an identity crisis among populations typically, if inaccurately, identified as "Muslims". The real question is not what ethnic or religious background newcomers and their progeny are from, but the means by which the French republic specifically endeavors to integrate them, which in my own experience has been essentially nil. The idea of effectively providing French language and citizenship classes to new immigrants was only introduced about 2-3 years ago (if I recall correctly, such projects have been around for a long time but were never put into practice with sufficient funding).

To return to the subject of Dr. Pipes' analysis, or mischaracterization as some would have it, I am willing to believe, based on my own experience and acquaintance with current events, that there are connections between :

1/ absence of integration and economic discrimination

2/ rejection of French identity and institutions

3/ identification with foreign cultures

4/ identification with Islamic ideology

5/ lawlessness

6/ poverty

To repeat what I've already stated elsewhere, I tend to believe that lawlessness, poverty and cultural isolation together create an environment in which Islamist ideology can flourish, and in some cases Islamist ideology may reciprocally promote lawlessness. Whether or not anarchy or lawlessness in areas with sizeable "Muslim" populations is synonymous with or preliminary to the establishment of "Dar al-Islam" within France is not a question I can answer in a satisfactory manner. Rather than seeking to advance any "agenda", I await Dr. Pipes' longer analysis of the subject.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (152) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
900, its the police themself [21 words]Dennis Blond Hald JensenJan 29, 2018 10:44242013
1What a difference a yarmulke makes [87 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
François GravelJan 25, 2015 01:40220671
1MY ADVICE [170 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
martinJan 16, 2015 21:27220434
2Hard to judge a book by its cover [785 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
R. CraigenJan 16, 2015 18:49220430
But this doesn't mean "no-go" [122 words]Bernd BauschJan 19, 2015 20:28220430
2It takes a while and then some [467 words]GuestJun 9, 2015 00:40220430
1The real danger here [234 words]JesperJan 15, 2015 18:16220401
3Glad to see your update/retraction in 2013, but I have a request... [1499 words]CMDJan 15, 2015 10:52220383
1Push the Retraction Up [125 words]WayneJan 20, 2015 00:33220383
Does Sarcelles as a whole qualify? [83 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Anon.Jan 15, 2015 08:42220381
6How Civil War Could Come To Europe [134 words]DaveJan 13, 2015 20:52220344
Right on [80 words]Coach ClydeSep 22, 2015 13:41220344
2List of ZUS on French government website has been removed [55 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ChrisJan 10, 2015 10:17220240
1No it hasn't grown [37 words]Bob1Jan 13, 2015 11:11220240
1Muslim no-go zones [248 words]Mr J D RobertJan 15, 2015 19:47220240
ZUS site not accessible [48 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
CaraxJun 18, 2019 04:07220240
6NO GO ZONES EQUALS A LAWLESS ZONE [79 words]Charlie HebdoJan 9, 2015 22:10220222
1You don't know what you are talking about [168 words]UdontKnoWhatYoureTalkingAboutJan 12, 2015 12:03220222
2You know absolutely nothing or live as a hermit [285 words]JesperJan 15, 2015 17:57220222
Au revoir [598 words]Michael SJan 18, 2015 08:18220222
1That is a good point [349 words]UdontKnoWhatYoureTalkingAboutJan 20, 2015 08:29220222
life in the Kasbah [270 words]Michael SJan 23, 2015 22:44220222
1Wrong [165 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MacTurkJan 9, 2015 18:21220213
4France bans street prayers [602 words]surinde97Sep 21, 2011 01:53189458
2Castration of a Kafir [153 words]spattriSep 24, 2011 22:14189458
Out of France! [44 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
John WilkensJan 10, 2015 17:45189458
4Let us not forget to applaud the French [133 words]PrashantSep 17, 2011 03:37189372
How far are we from universal love? [99 words]Wine TogoMay 16, 2011 03:58185262
6It started with the Kosovo War [52 words]1389ADSep 4, 2010 19:38177683
4Bill Clinton and his infamous influences in history [251 words]saraSep 5, 2010 17:45177683
clintons [7 words]righchessFeb 18, 2011 23:54177683
1yugoslavia falling apart [15 words]gggggggMar 24, 2011 06:22177683
This is much older than you think. [80 words]FLIT ANDERSENFeb 28, 2015 05:15177683
1What islam is not [20 words]John DoeFeb 8, 2010 01:08168606
6Should we stop allowing muslims to come to the West ? 09' [165 words]Phil GreendJun 23, 2009 19:12157846
We can't stop allowing them [191 words]TchJan 14, 2015 08:45157846
2what next? [184 words]Rebecca MouldsMar 14, 2008 14:49122649
Bergen: Ban on rain coats for police officers suggested! [93 words]Mysil BergsprekkenFeb 2, 2010 18:07122649
2Who rules Britain? [164 words]jennifer solisMar 14, 2008 02:48122616
Overeaction [117 words]Mr J D RobertJan 15, 2015 20:02122616
1Sensitivities !!! [273 words]dfwhite19438Mar 14, 2008 00:48122609
1BAGNEAUX is not listed as DAI [171 words]YnnatchkahMar 13, 2008 09:55122562
1No Go Zones [60 words]Linda HaslamFeb 7, 2008 10:55119718
1What's next? No Go Zones for religious NeoNazis, Mafia and Drug Lords... [95 words]KristaMar 13, 2008 09:13119718
Dar Al Islam Zones In South America. [392 words]YnnatchkahFeb 6, 2008 01:23119643
canadian govt. punishes private citizen for violating sharia [16 words]darrellJan 20, 2008 00:52118609
1Does this mean that [199 words]Long live moosesJan 7, 2008 18:51117686
french arrogance [39 words]churlFeb 3, 2008 19:35117686
Obama as savior? [105 words]Archimedes2Feb 6, 2008 18:59117686
ones savior is anothers demon? [48 words]larry BJan 16, 2015 16:32117686
Paris, ah, Paris [84 words]Scott A. Joseph, MDJun 10, 2007 04:3797308
1balance please [332 words]petermhmurray@yahoo.comFeb 13, 2008 17:1997308
french military prowess [318 words]bosFeb 14, 2008 12:0797308
French Values = Oxymoron [55 words]KevinFeb 23, 2007 12:2178502
some further comments on ZUS [931 words]danielDec 2, 2006 14:2568046
agenda and fact [376 words]paulmhmurphyDec 3, 2006 16:0568046
agenda, fact or analysis? [1712 words]danielDec 4, 2006 20:2068046
What do you call this " Sudden Islamic Conversion Syndrome " ??? [156 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
KishmishDec 5, 2006 18:4768046
addendum [617 words]danielDec 6, 2006 02:5368046
rejoinder to daniel [741 words]paul murphyDec 7, 2006 07:2768046
I second the request for an update [306 words]Archimedes2May 5, 2007 14:1868046
WHY NO CORRECTION? [22 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ChappyNov 30, 2006 03:4267826
Martial Law Time. And, [61 words]Greg HalvorsonNov 29, 2006 12:3267745
France is no Iraq [102 words]chucoNov 29, 2006 11:0667723
1France is no Iraq yet . [143 words]IanusNov 29, 2006 17:0967723
Ha Ha France!! [20 words]Abu WenNov 29, 2006 02:4967676
Nemesis against France [190 words]IanusNov 29, 2006 18:4067676
No more paranoia please [342 words]OlivierJan 28, 2007 03:3667676
No more paranoia please... Just sober Islamic common sense instead ... [1209 words]IanusJan 30, 2007 16:1667676
Is it Paranoia or Blissful Ignorance? [26 words]KevinFeb 23, 2007 12:0567676
Somber Realization [64 words]KevinFeb 23, 2007 12:1167676
submission by any name [132 words]larryBJan 16, 2015 16:5967676
Abolishing the ZUS unfounded myth [177 words]HarrakNov 28, 2006 23:4467665
It's true, I've seen it. [62 words]Evan JohnsonNov 28, 2006 23:2767662
highly interesting! same case in India !! [211 words]anti-jihadiNov 27, 2006 09:5767460
irony [163 words]paulmurphyNov 27, 2006 18:3867460
Change the subject again [233 words]GregNov 28, 2006 18:0267460
You are right [25 words]TerryApr 14, 2007 19:0567460
The fruits of the Euro-Arab Dialogue [80 words]EarlNov 27, 2006 06:5267454
Actually, it's 752 ZUS zones, not 751 [38 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mark JamesNov 26, 2006 20:2467426
Wrong [70 words]TesterNov 26, 2006 15:1667409
Wrong Country [39 words]Right of Center FilipinoNov 27, 2006 01:2067409
He is referring to France. Not the wrong country. [98 words]DomNov 28, 2006 17:5467409
policing or economic development? [214 words]clazyNov 26, 2006 12:2667399
ZUS and the French [270 words]Howard LucasNov 26, 2006 08:5667391
Shari'a Law for Europe [206 words]Jay Van CampNov 26, 2006 00:4867366
World war 3 on the way [169 words]Michal RavdinNov 25, 2006 13:1367316
World War III Michael Ravdin [52 words]TLSNov 25, 2006 21:3267316
Right on !!! [147 words]dfwhiteNov 26, 2006 15:4067316
Without a fight Europe has become isl;amic, the cowards. Thank you Blair and Balkenende [215 words]Jaan KratsOct 30, 2009 20:4067316
The cost-benefit analysis [40 words]OctavioNov 25, 2006 06:4367272
In reference to the zones of Paris. [39 words]TLSNov 25, 2006 01:1867254
Barbarians at the Gates of Paris? [32 words]MosheNov 25, 2006 15:1367254
mischaracterization [71 words]Adam StanhopeNov 25, 2006 00:3467250
2misinformation and nonsense [316 words]paul murphyNov 25, 2006 07:5167250
2wake up [223 words]jo mNov 25, 2006 11:1467250
denial [388 words]danielNov 25, 2006 11:2167250
Heads in the Sands of Paris? [274 words]J.S.Nov 26, 2006 13:0567250
at your peril [57 words]terryApr 14, 2007 19:1867250
not quite as portrayed [510 words]paul murphyNov 24, 2006 18:2267223
No excuse [154 words]OctavioNov 25, 2006 13:0367223
No-Go Zones - coming soon to North America? [41 words]Susan Freis FalknorNov 24, 2006 17:4767220
NIMBY ! [145 words]dfwhite19438Mar 15, 2008 02:1867220
Outrageous [133 words]dfwhiteNov 24, 2006 16:4167211
dar-al-islam [23 words]william papkeNov 24, 2006 16:3967210
Let me answer [49 words]OtcavioNov 24, 2006 19:0267210
Little Maghreb [49 words]OctavioNov 24, 2006 19:5367210
Surrender....Again [40 words]Jim McMullenNov 24, 2006 21:3767210
the greatest italian writer: Oriana Fallaci [3 words]pierNov 25, 2006 09:5467210
The Muj [38 words]Heavy JackNov 24, 2006 16:2167207
The Muj [33 words]IanusNov 25, 2006 11:5267207
Bye Bye France [18 words]Alyn StarkmanNov 24, 2006 16:0667204
1Allowing One Group to Create Laws While Ignoring All Others [853 words]S RalstonNov 24, 2006 16:0667203
Daniel Pipes for President! [21 words]Vladimir JabotinskyNov 24, 2006 14:0567192
Probably happening elsewhere...just less "official"... [218 words]J.S.Nov 24, 2006 12:3067186
That's Europe, for you [49 words]OctavioNov 24, 2006 18:5867186
J.S. [164 words]OctavioNov 25, 2006 04:2367186
fabrications [81 words]richard lionheartNov 25, 2006 04:3467186
Richard, Richard [52 words]OctavioNov 25, 2006 19:4467186
What?? [346 words]J.S.Nov 25, 2006 19:5667186
Moslem intrigues in Sweden [343 words]IanusNov 27, 2006 15:0967186
Not fabrications - car torchings [111 words]studentpatNov 28, 2006 15:3967186
Ianus... [246 words]J.S.Nov 28, 2006 18:1567186
1French Moslem army [150 words]IanusNov 29, 2006 10:4267186
Kant for Moslems [557 words]IanusNov 29, 2006 18:0267186
I would just like to say, I agree with your scenario, Ianus... [152 words]J.S.Nov 29, 2006 18:5667186
Yesterday Algeria , tomorrow France ? [86 words]IanusNov 30, 2006 18:2867186
Indeed, chaos awaits... [599 words]J.S.Nov 30, 2006 20:5967186
Logic of chaos [1232 words]IanusDec 1, 2006 19:0767186
Nice Commentary [50 words]JeffDec 2, 2006 11:1667186
Hagia Sophia and the mosques [185 words]IanusDec 3, 2006 12:0367186
For your edification [381 words]jeffDec 3, 2006 23:2367186
France [56 words]Octavio JohansonNov 24, 2006 12:2867185
Republican's Next Big Issue: De-Nuclearize France [126 words]JoeNov 24, 2006 12:0767183
Victory by womb [39 words]JesperJan 15, 2015 17:3167183
American ZUS's [126 words]Dave PetteysNov 24, 2006 12:0167181
La mort de France [16 words]PhillipNov 24, 2006 11:5367179
ZUS [37 words]msNov 24, 2006 11:2667173
Why are they called no-go zones? [56 words]Tom F.Nov 24, 2006 11:2267172
Urban Xray [19 words]LDCNov 24, 2006 11:1767169
The fruits of political correctness [277 words]f.shaNov 24, 2006 10:3967164
diversity [79 words]thewestiscomplacentDec 19, 2006 01:2467164
I thought the French had more sense [47 words]Herb SamenfeldNov 24, 2006 10:3867162
I thought the French had more sense [103 words]IanusNov 25, 2006 12:4367162
Why did french play dominant role in the enlightenment? [6 words]aaMar 7, 2007 04:1667162
Why did french play dominant role in the enlightenment? [39 words]IanusMar 7, 2007 17:3067162
1MUSLIM TAKEOVER [81 words]CHARLIE BAXTERMay 27, 2009 14:2367162
Muslim takeover [174 words]IanusMay 28, 2009 05:3867162
Deportation [24 words]PeterNov 24, 2006 09:3967157
a caveat on French ZUSs [433 words]danielNov 24, 2006 04:2067140
And that is only the top of the iceberg [61 words]Alain Jean-MairetNov 24, 2006 01:4967134
The not so antiseptic acronym for Dar al-Islam zones would be DAI zones [17 words]Mark JamesNov 24, 2006 00:5967128

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)