Washington Post :: Reader comments at Daniel Pipes

Submitted by James Macek (United States), Apr 21, 2003 at 14:27

Dear Friends:

One should not be surprised by the Washington Post's article not endorsing Daniel Pipes to the Institute for Peace. I've long since written my senators and congresspersons encouraging their support for Dr. Pipes and I'd suggest you do the same!

Like Dislike

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment Next Comment >>

Reader comments (14) on this item

	Title	Commenter	Date	Thread
1	Moderate Islam [242 words]	Subidh	Jan 13, 2009 00:45	147902
	Moderate Islam [199 words]	subidh	Oct 16, 2009 00:09	147902
	Let Truth be the Criterion [82 words]	Joel Benjamin	Jun 1, 2003 18:00	9318
	Nomination Mr. Daniel Pipes [52 words]	Manuel Cheskes	May 23, 2003 01:23	9193
	Radical & "moderate" in the World of Islam [141 words]	Y Kurilkah	May 22, 2003 02:55	9173
	Only here [84 words]	Kathleen	Apr 22, 2003 09:08	8537
	How do we help this nomination? [27 words]	Judith Schechter	Apr 22, 2003 09:00	8536
	Who cares if Saudi Arabia doesn't want Daniel Pipes to be confirmed [247 words]	RPaine	Apr 22, 2003 01:01	8526
	Kennedy at dinner [31 words]	Joel Glaser, MD	Apr 21, 2003 16:33	8516
	Islamist Terror [49 words]	Paul Rinderle	Apr 21, 2003 14:36	8509
	Washington Post [41 words]	James Macek	Apr 21, 2003 14:27	8508
	Pipes nomination [14 words]	Leslie J Paldpn	Apr 21, 2003 13:30	8503
	How to support nomination [278 words]	Ilona Melstrads	Apr 21, 2003 13:25	8498
	Thank you [144 words]	Melvin A. Fechter	Apr 21, 2003 13:24	8497