Harrak may be right in his analysis

Submitted by Sindy Shmidth (Canada), Jun 14, 2007 at 20:48

the reason being is that he only based on the ramification of 2006 war between hizballah and lebanon. the lesson was that hizballah missiles can go far and rain continuously while israel pulls back and call the UN for help. top israeli analysts qualify that war as failure. basically if you fail with a gangster group of militant hizballah, how can you win against a gangster state?

please do not underestimate the enemy and think twice, because the world now has changed. someone said it is smelling WWIII. if such war happens, i do not think that we will be among the VETO state because when the war is nuclear, the next rulers of the world will be nuclear states and ugly nuclear states..who will win by will to destroy and be destroyed.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".