69 million page views

"War As Social Work"

Reader comment on item: War as Social Work?

Submitted by Renee Bouvier (United States), Nov 8, 2007 at 15:32

If a country's government along with its taxspayers are not prepared to foot the bill and/or are financially incapable of footing the bill for social reconstruction, then that country's military should not become and/or declare itself as an occupying force or power. This is especially true for a government, which is unable to fulfill its socioeconomic and sociopolitical responsibilities and obligations to its own infrastructure and indigenous population at home.

It has been demonstrated over and over again that one cannot have his cake and likewise eat it without suffering irreparable consequences. Before voting a regime into power, myopically cheerleading its foreign policies, and then, beating the war drums, it is wise to first fully and objectively analyze such blind and foolish endeavors. The moral of the story is: Think before you enter the voting booth. Otherwise, you may find many of your young, talented fellow citizenry, the future leaders of our beloved country, voting with their feet. American supremacy is a very subjective and dangerous ideology reminiscent of other past hegemonic powers we would rather not repeat or remember. We are only and ultimately hurting ourselves in propagating such an ideology of supremacy just as the Germans once foolishly did.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (51) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1A new military strategy in Afghanistan that might work. [353 words]Bill PazaratzNov 6, 2010 22:46179994
"War As Social Work" [201 words]Renee BouvierNov 8, 2007 15:32113438
Enhancing America's Security vs. War as Social Work [22 words]jennifer solisOct 13, 2007 14:40111385
WELcome democracy [92 words]samanJul 12, 2005 22:1623422
The Long Term [180 words]AdamJul 23, 2003 11:5010178
War as Social work [164 words]A.K. LenceskiMay 23, 2003 02:149196
A problem [605 words]David IseckeMay 14, 2003 17:489069
Brilliant! [26 words]Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D.May 14, 2003 11:159053
reason for military intervention [102 words]dave morrisMay 9, 2003 19:528979
Real war [189 words]A.A.May 9, 2003 18:388978
Strengthening alliances [247 words]Antonio ChavesMay 8, 2003 14:278960
USA saved Aussie bacon as well [166 words]Craig LawrieMay 8, 2003 00:418939
Social Work and National Interest [171 words]William KinneyMay 7, 2003 23:018937
The administration has an obligation to the American people to provide what it promised [223 words]Alex CMay 7, 2003 20:098934
Altruism benefits no one [125 words]Maryallene OtisMay 7, 2003 18:418933
Thank you for calling attention to the media's spin [171 words]K WallMay 7, 2003 16:308930
How about DeSoto property rights? [48 words]Jules C.May 7, 2003 13:178929
Well Done [14 words]Moshe CohenMay 7, 2003 12:488927
Then why....? [73 words]Barbara RunkelMay 7, 2003 05:428921
Remember 9/11 and American security? [160 words]Ivan BarnaMay 7, 2003 01:268919
Amen [131 words]Jim FitzgeraldMay 7, 2003 01:108918
Well put! [15 words]PennyMay 7, 2003 00:018916
The road to hell [16 words]Vivek L. DevMay 6, 2003 23:358915
It doesn't follow [226 words]Jim RyanMay 6, 2003 21:498914
Unique point of view [22 words]Ann CiccolellaMay 6, 2003 19:568912
Brilliant Insight [62 words]Peter H. RonaiMay 6, 2003 19:328911
Whose Security? [305 words]Giulio BattistonMay 6, 2003 18:328909
Take a Spin [5 words]N. HayesMay 6, 2003 18:288908
Americans help make the economic recovery become possible... [84 words]Tilman WinklerMay 6, 2003 18:188907
Islamist Schools [95 words]Graham Rael-BrookMay 6, 2003 16:538906
Nation Building [152 words]Paul M. NevilleMay 6, 2003 15:008904
Very well-said about war [125 words]rjalexandMay 6, 2003 14:518903
Amazing [51 words]Larry BensonMay 6, 2003 14:298902
War against Iraq [72 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Samir Khalil SAMIR, SJMay 6, 2003 14:098901
Philanthropy is our interest! [191 words]AvrahamMay 6, 2003 13:368900
I respectfully disagree [128 words]Boris GurevichMay 6, 2003 13:268899
Surrender And Be Free! [176 words]EdMay 6, 2003 13:208898
Thank you: intelligence with common sense [25 words]Marcella JenkinsMay 6, 2003 13:158897
Social work required [131 words]JockoMay 6, 2003 13:108896
Right on!!! [107 words]Jacob B. Padgug, Ed.D.May 6, 2003 12:588895
A ray of sanity [126 words]Patrick BramwellMay 6, 2003 12:148894
Other Wars [88 words]Jeff FosterMay 6, 2003 12:068893
Pipes says what Bush Admin Thinks [180 words]Larry DerfnerMay 6, 2003 11:278892
With respect, this time you're off-track. [239 words]David ScholemMay 6, 2003 11:198891
Iraqi Freedom [24 words]Ron WeinerMay 6, 2003 11:178890
Germany after WWII [54 words]G.C. Colan, Esq.May 6, 2003 10:568888
"Moral" interests [233 words]Ali LebanonMay 6, 2003 10:138884
The Ultimate War Goal? [146 words]Alain Jean-MairetMay 6, 2003 09:578882
Dr. Pipes has identified a MAJOR guiding principle. [86 words]DSm.May 6, 2003 09:518880
Nemesis of Islamists [180 words]R.D. CrockettMay 6, 2003 09:198879
Oh how the truth hurts! [155 words]Daniel LenardMay 6, 2003 09:168878

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)