69 million page views

The Real Enemy

Reader comment on item: The Guantánamo Arrests – What Do They Mean?

Submitted by Kyle Gosnell (United States), Oct 2, 2003 at 07:30

I find your pointing toward a real enemy correct, in as much , a way of at least not holding our head in the sand , as "many" would have us do. I refer to the "Many", meaning those who have slight of hand involvement, old style peacenics who would sell their Mother if it would all go away, political correctness types.

We Americans are viewed as blundering , mean minded Idiots, who use brute force to solve everything. The ones now who face us, are elitist , and not necessarily all Moslem, but have the common view WE must be wrong, if WE approve of it.

You can call it the Ugly American syndrome gone wrong, where actually ,using average persons around the Globe, it is a mix of local propaganda, and our own Media's penchant for showing only the extremes of our society.

You are correct in as much Militant Moslems are the Enemy , BUT, lets expand this to the proper level in the whole scheme of what is happening. From my meager understanding of the Koran, it's against the rules to Steal, kill innocents, lie, that sort of thing, these are "outlaws", yet, if these criminals Are Moslem, or some variation of it, the Rest of the Arabic Moslem World approve of them over their victims, especially if some Militant Cleric, or Higher Religious leader is behind it, no matter how bizarre the act. Case in point is the torture of the Stewardesses onboard the Airliners that were used to attack the Trade Towers, to get the Pilots to come out of the Cockpits. I know this has been smothered by even our own media as so horrific, even they are afraid to make a Deal out of it, yet, the Arabic World stands behind their "Brothers" who sliced and diced innocents, using their screams to achieve their goal.

Mr Pipes, we have an Enemy, it is the WAY of thinking at a basic level, not just militant Moslems, as their Leaders in their faith, will not condemn the crazies who are Our active enemy, rather must for some reason , laud them as brothers, who they cannot turn their backs on.

WE seem to have divided into two different Races, as far apart in thinking , and basic interacting , as any Race we might encounter in the Void of the Universe. Though we are Bipedal, breath oxygen, we are apart in understanding, and basic way of thinking.

I do not advocate war, it not only harms innocents, it destroys the environment, and we should at our level of civilization , be able to resolve conflicts in a better way, unfortunately, we are forced, in a brutal way to protect our citizens, from those who are brutal, as well as those who manipulate stealthily, and make it seem so.

I find it an interesting aspect for scholars at this time, to observe this era of our development, and should be interesting material for historians at some point. The real thought in my mind now, is who these scholars will be, as well as will it be over who's bones, or civilization? Make no mistake, some of our avowed enemies would prefer it to be our bones !!!!

( Mr. Pipes , Do not be swayed by the thinking of our enemies, nor allow frustration get at you, they simply cannot understand our point of view, as it's too alien to them .. . )
Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (52) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
From Immigrant To US Marine [27 words]Lt. Col. Dominik George Nargele USMC (Ret) ( Author)Sep 6, 2005 00:3625505
Swimming in half truths [34 words]MArco MachiavelliJan 24, 2004 17:5513523
Why God in the military? [263 words]Travis WorkmanNov 16, 2003 23:5912201
The Guantanamo Arrests, Oct. 1,2003 [78 words]S.C.PandaNov 6, 2003 15:4612094
How Is This Not Terrorism? [146 words]Mary Ann MeierOct 7, 2003 13:0911725
islam is the problem [11 words]JoMay 1, 2009 04:2811725
Stastical Analysis: The Correct way to look at it [196 words]Leonard ApplebaumOct 7, 2003 10:2811715
sarah (?) eltanawi [84 words]Joyena AbrahamOct 5, 2003 17:5711696
Military/PC [74 words]zeph ruziahOct 5, 2003 13:0711692
Percentages [125 words]Gershon Y. Perry, M.D., F.A.C.C.Oct 4, 2003 16:4711685
Has O'Reilly Really lost his mind? [47 words]Howard MirkinOct 4, 2003 14:0611683
1Militant Islam - We must destroy it [166 words]Pete DumasOct 3, 2003 17:5111680
Convert them [43 words]elijah jay clarkFeb 26, 2006 19:1611680
Militant Islam [43 words]S SinghAug 11, 2006 08:2311680
Ants [73 words]Michael ArianOct 3, 2003 15:2211679
Have You Noticed... [158 words]J. SpiroOct 3, 2003 14:3011677
1Japanese Internment and Muslims [1197 words]Bob PriceOct 3, 2003 12:1511676
Regarding your comments [61 words]Austin SatoJun 4, 2007 13:0711676
Just a 'comment' [84 words]A lover of the English language (Amanda)Nov 3, 2009 18:5511676
PC too far? [81 words]Ivan BarnaOct 2, 2003 21:5811674
Daniel, You sure know more than Sarah Eltantawi [14 words]GaryOct 2, 2003 18:1511669
Islamists need extra vetting [101 words]A. AhmedOct 2, 2003 18:0111668
People like Daniel Pipes [86 words]Jeff BercovitchOct 2, 2003 17:3011667
In complete agreement [230 words]Mariana Harari FromentOct 2, 2003 16:0111665
Eltantawi and her comments [122 words]Shahin ShadmerOct 2, 2003 13:3211664
Facts v Lies [10 words]Charles ChristineOct 2, 2003 13:2711663
Better vet than dead [56 words]Virginia ThogersenOct 2, 2003 13:0511662
The numbers are insignificant... [87 words]LucileOct 2, 2003 12:2911661
Similarities in treason during World War II, the Cold War, and now. [234 words]Dr. William E. WatsonOct 2, 2003 11:0211660
On your O'Reilly Factor appearance. [32 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sol LevitinOct 2, 2003 10:4911657
1Muslim clerics [126 words]Dov Sussman, Esq.Oct 2, 2003 10:3511656
9 out of > 4,000 isn't many. [433 words]Peter J. HerzOct 2, 2003 10:2111655
Chasing our tails [96 words]John MaloneyOct 2, 2003 08:5611652
The Real Enemy [579 words]Kyle GosnellOct 2, 2003 07:3011650
Eltantawi More Interested in Dissing Dr. Pipes [238 words]Dan BobinskiOct 2, 2003 05:0311649
u.s.military chaplains in particular muslims [148 words]robert finkOct 2, 2003 01:5311647
Muslems involved in the military's war on terror [131 words]Dennis BrownOct 2, 2003 01:5111646
Muslims in the Army [38 words]Walter E. WallisOct 2, 2003 01:3611645
Assimilation [206 words]Robert HicksOct 2, 2003 00:3911644
Sarah Eltantawi [241 words]Nora AmraniOct 2, 2003 02:0511642
Appearance on O'Reilly Sept. 30 [109 words]harold foxOct 2, 2003 01:4511639
bush needs to say it [12 words]pat forrestalOct 2, 2003 01:2611638
Eltantawi harms moderate Muslims [87 words]Lori-Ann BernathOct 2, 2003 00:1911636
Relative Likelihood of Terrorism Among Muslims and Non-Muslims [81 words]P. G. LubinOct 2, 2003 00:0911635
Sept. 30th O'Reilly Program [106 words]JeanOct 1, 2003 23:4311634
No Answer [17 words]Betty MatherneOct 1, 2003 23:0011631
Forthright [31 words]Stephen MachtOct 1, 2003 22:5311630
Gitmo Arrests [218 words]James HellwigOct 1, 2003 22:3511629
muslim traitors? [77 words]Y. B. DavidOct 1, 2003 21:5311627
What Muslim Clerics Preach [87 words]Mike RamirezOct 1, 2003 21:3511625
O'Reilly appearance [94 words]Professor Matthew YarczowerOct 1, 2003 21:3311624
the o'reilly show. [72 words]kevin cardOct 1, 2003 21:0411622

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)