A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing,......... but here it might help

Submitted by bos (United Kingdom), Mar 29, 2008 at 08:37

I just dont understand why you bother responding if your not actually responding.

I have tried to tolerate it because you have entertained me a little, normally at least a small part of your post connects to the preceding post and I have made allowances because I get the impression your a teenage boy (no offence intended if your not)

I would have to be 'off planet' to have not already presumed your faith Mohamed, Its irrelevent!

You have failed to respond to the quranic citations in my last post and we both know why. you have directed me to a church or mosque to be told about God; There are people with me who know my education and background, they read that and Laughed very hard. Lets just say I have demonstrated a greater knowledge of all three Abrahamic faiths than you.

There you go with comedy comments regarding Hitlers cross on his flag! No Mohamed it was not a cross it was a Swastika, a symbol from Asia where hitler thought his arian roots lay thousands of years before. He sponsored extensive study to try and prove a genetic link to the mountainous regions north of India. The Other german heraldic symbol was an Iron Cross, it predates hitler and is not a crucifix.

Further Hitler was not a Christian, he saw Christianity as a Jewish inspired liquidation of the Nordic spirit, he called it proto-bolshevism. He also clearly had a variety of occultic inclinations with a nordic rather than Judeo-christian premise.

This isnt a website concerned with comparative religion, its focus primarily is on investigation and analysis of issues pertaining to islamism

I didnt ask you to generalise, I asked you to condemn an evil done to those you claim as your own ummah by those who claim to do that evil in your name and for the sake of your faith. I have no doubt you would be quick enough to condemn me or a dutch cartoonist for scribbling a doodle of the prophet and proclaiming it for free speech, but you cant condemn a man for murdering children and proclaiming it for islam and the muslims.

Again with the crusades, so again I ask, why are the executions by Couer de lion at Acre terrorism, but the executions by salah al din at hattin are no impediment to his pious reputatation

I enjoy debating with anyone who will actually present their position and respond directly to counter evidence and counterpoint, I find it both enjoyable and useful in so much as it helps me to develop and strenghen my own opinions. This nonsense is providing neither benefit.

Peace

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".