actually, Amil is on the RIGHT side of history

Submitted by The Grand Infidel of Kaffiristan (Australia), Oct 15, 2008 at 23:15

Saeed wrote

"..........Islam is a Winner and will DEFEAT all ideologies.Islam NEVER gets DEFEAT !To Defeat Islam is to Defeat al-mighty creator God (Allah).And the creation cannot defeat its creator.

as though he thought this was some great insight he was having that must be shared with others.

My previous response to .Mr Saeed was to ask him to preface his opinions with the opening prefix ' ..in my opinion....' rather than to state hyperbole as fact. Obviously he has ignored this advice and continued in his wishful thinking, delusional ways.

It doesn't seem to have occured to him that any religion could make similar statements with just as much veracity as he does. Who can prove or disprove ?

(excepting the patently obvious lie that 'Islam NEVER gets DEFEAT !'

(Do the words Spain and Gates of Vienna ring any bells? Westerners are called 'Crusaders' because why? Answer: they took back lands stolen by Arab raiders.)

eg.

Hindus can say 'Hinduism is a Winner and will DEFEAT all ideologies.Hinduism NEVER gets DEFEAT !To Defeat Hinduism is to Defeat the Brahman - .And the creation cannot defeat its creator.

Buddhists can say 'Buddhism is a Winner and will DEFEAT all ideologies.Buddhism NEVER gets DEFEAT !To Defeat Buddhism is to Defeat the Self - .And the Self cannot defeat Itself"

Of course no real religion is conceited enough to think it holds all truth. However the politico-religious tenets of Islam require that its adherents maintain this stance - so we can continue to expect such strident yet empty clamourings.

So Mr. Saeed's statements in essence have no real meaning and are just so much fanciful thinking - of course brought about by countless hours of indoctrination into a primitve and pre-medieval set of beliefs.

Too much time + energy invested to possibly even consider the idea that 'hmmm, maybe I'm wrong' ?

A certain arrogance.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".