This was not a tragedy but a standard Islamic murder

Submitted by spirit (United Kingdom), Feb 23, 2009 at 19:28

We have seen commenters here describing this as a tragedy. Now it would have been a tragedy had she died of natural causes, in an accident or by an 'act of God'. This was none of them. It was a cold and calculated first degree murder Islamic style, otherwise known as a honour killing. Once again Islam has been outed as the barbaric cult it is, and the irony of it all was the fact it happened to someone who made a life out of defending Islam. And she has become a victim of what she defended. In her last moments, she discovered the folly of defending the religious equivalent of a rabid dog, when it was too late.

But during her lifetime, her defence of Islam has caused the suffering of women to go on and on. Despite the fact that she was used as a punchbag by her wicked husband, she still defended his ways. By default Muslim women seem to have masochistic tendencies. They rarely question the misogyny inherent in that cult. Their hatred of and their contempt towards the infidel far outweighs their hatred of the cruelty inflicted upon them by their Muslim spouses. They wish death upon Jews and other infidels but never the brutes who beat them to a pulp and ultimately to their deaths, or as in this case hack off their head. And this is a testament to the sick and vile indoctrination they've been exposed to throughout their lives courtesy of their faith.

However, when all is said and done, her death did more to reveal the truth about Islam than what she ever did in life, because in life she lied to defend her faith - and lying to defend her faith was something she could no longer do as the truth spilled out in death.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".