On terms and concepts

Submitted by salah ali (Norway), Apr 1, 2009 at 08:31

In fact, it is the same mistake again. You give yourselves the right of judgment, neclecting of course history besides logic in the European or say Kantiana terms. The expressions or rather concepts sited by Mr. Seiple are wide and profound. They lack definition and definition would always escape them. The problem appears to be rather philosophical but Mr. Seiple brings down to history and politics.

Assimilation can be viewed to mean either end of the cultural spectrum ( Christianity vs Islam). Faith is on the other hand dogma and talking of interfaith is an oxymoron. Historically, Muslems are praised for tolarence and reformation is qwhat made Muslems abhor such outbursts of democracy and western freedom as that of the Austrian father locking up and raping his daughter.

But what one can expect from political whores as Bush and the modern hooligans who try to recolonize the world by false concept as globalization, interfaith. It is more like she-maling history ...For us who live among you, we know exactly what you mean by such terms... you kill us by missiles, invasion, democracy and ... like Olmert and Natinyaho and suggest interfaith, tolerance democracy ..Why don't you throw such ... in the trash for there is no muslim who reads or understands this desparate propaganda

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".