Israel's Response of Maintaining Her Security - Courage for Netanyahu's Sunday Answer to a World Chafing at Israel's Defiance

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Jun 11, 2009 at 11:25

The world indeed does not understand Israel. For in the belief system that abstains from honoring the Hebrew Holy Scriptures and pursues instead plans of a false peace at the cost of Israel, we see the global enterprise that is charging ahead for a two state solution in complete disregard for the consequences stemming from that misunderstanding.

The American administration, in stepping up to the Arab powers challenge to 'solve' the Middle East crisis by offering up Israel in pieces for peace, has made its position plan for all to see; that in contradiction to previous policies of predecessor administrations which nominally called Israel friend, the shift away from that relationship (against the general American citizen's friendship for Israel) is cause for serious concern.

Sunday will bring the official Israeli government response to the pressure of the current American administration by Prime Minister Netanyahu. It is thought (expected by some) to be a reinforcement of the previously released information that Israel will not be pressured where her national integrity is impugned by an ignorance of her right to exist. To that result, her sovereignty and security will remain paramount in her government's defense of the historical Jewish lands held, the demands of a 'Palestinian' state by the world notwithstanding.

Israel will pay dearly for standing in the way of the current American administration's demands, for having the courage to be an obstacle of the global changes sought after at Israel's expense. Be that as it may, it will be seen that the price to pay for assuming an antagonistic attitude against Israel is going to be more costly that if one were to do the simple, correct, and right thing; to stand with Israel in her defense. It will be seen eventually that should have been the only approach from the very beginning, even before 1948, 1967; for all time.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".