|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No Labor and no Shas!Reader comment on item: Media Distortion about Israel - One Example Submitted by Amerisrael (United States), Jan 4, 2011 at 14:47 The last Israeli election and new poll results show most Israelis have awakened to the fact that the politics of appeasement doesn't work. The fact is that Israel has never had a genuine partner for peace. It is sad that too many Israeli politicians like Livni and Barak are still asleep. Israel would be served better by a coalition government that did not include any of the "appeasement" liberal parties such as Labor and Kadima. As for Shas, they have always been an "extortion" party, a thorn in the side for any coalition. Netanyahu could form a conservative government without Labor, Shas, or Kadima. That would be best for Israel. As far as media bias goes, the MSM will never be truly honest when it comes to Israel, Jews, Christians, or conservatives. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (12) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |