What does the Trinity has to do with your bogus claim that millions were killed during the Arian heresy? Islamic tawheed? It is bogus

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 31, 2011 at 07:02

Our dear esq the wannabe Arab wrote

>The perplexity of the Trinity remains unresolved. People learn in school that 1+1+1= 3. But in church they are told 1+1+1= 1. How can three distinct persons be one being? Conservative Christians admit that the Trinity does not make sense. M. R. DeHaan, a renowned Christian apologist, wrote, "The Trinity, that is, three persons in one, is a mystery which is revealed in the Bible, but cannot be understood by the human mind. Since man is finite, and God infinite, this is one of those things which must be accepted by faith, even though it cannot be reasoned out. The Trinity cannot be explained, but it must be believed ..." Believers are told to submit themselves to the interpretations of their spiritual leaders and accept them without understanding them.
The major beliefs of Christianity were formed by those who had the power to make their own views the standard view for the mass of believers.

What does the trinity have to do with asking you for evidence to support your bogus claim that millions were killed because of the Arian heresy? Enlighten us ya ayuha al-falyasoof al-kabeer!

Mr Einstein what gave you the impression that I'm Christian or care about the trinity?

But wait; "If Allah creates this creation then who really created Allah"? So who really created your Allah ?

For the readers: Our dear Esd the wannabe Arab has no clue that this is straight from the biography of his so called prophet where the Aristotelian problem was addressed and the outcome is that islamic tawheed is a fraud that can be refuted by the profound Greek logic

Oh my source? Ibn Ishaq's Sirat rasul allah safha khums ma'a wa ethnayn wa sab3een

Oh darn it the Arabic! May be you can ask your mullah to translate it for you

So much for Islamic tawheed

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".