Surat al-Ikhlas revisited and our dear Esq bogus translation and funny transliteration

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 9, 2011 at 08:09

Our dear Esq who is really no more than a Feqi (also Fiqi) or Fe'ee and this is the lowest on the totem pole of Islamic mullahs and who is debating a language that he cannot read speak or write and i call this bizarre

>Qul ho walla o ahaad:

ROTFL Pakistani Arabic it is

Qul Huwa Allahu Ahad you are clueless right? you have no clue about the indvidual words right mr Einstein? See what happens when you think that you can read a book but you are unable to do so?

>Say, "He is Allah , [who is] One,

OK let us translate it back to Arabic

Qul huwa yakun Allah (al-ladhi yakun) WAHID

Forget even the poor grammar but is this what the aya says? No it does not as it says

Say He Allah is ONE OF

So who are the other Allahs beside Allah? Any guesses?

The word Ahad in the aya means one of how many times do I have to tell you that? and it is a loan word (gasp!) from hebrew and Syriac!

What a fadiha! Oh do not panic scandal that Allah is one of and not ONE

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".