Teaching Arabic to wannabe Arabs

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 16, 2013 at 07:25

Our dear submitter the wannabe Arab whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by Islam wrote

? the proclamation God is 'One Of' (People would be laughing at how you interpret it :) )

Why do you debate not one but two languages that you do not read speak or write you tell me and where is your dictionary sources about the meaning of the Arabic word Ahad and wahid and what does the Hebrew Shema have to do with surat al-ikhlas? you tell me but read my post about this Quranic disaster and Quranic plagiarism

Why the delusions and lies?

יהוה אחד (Deuteronomy 6:4) God is One

الله احد (Quran 112:1) God is One (and Only)

Mr Ignorant in Arabic a language that you cannot speak read or write such sentence would be المبتدأ here would be الله and الخبر would be واحد very simple and to the point and here is the meaning of the word واحد if you can read Arabic which I doubt very much

1. الوَاحِدُ - وَاحِدُ :

   الوَاحِدُ : من صفات الله تعالى ، معناه أَنَّه لا ثانيَ له ، ذو الوَحدانية والتوحُّد .
   و الوَاحِدُ أَوَّلُ .
   عدد الحساب ؛ وقد يُثَّنى .
   قال :

   المعجم: المعجم الوسيط

I do not see any Ahad here so can you tell what it says about it in Mujam el-waseet? You are and you must pardon me ignorant and here is from the same dictionary and notice that the editors are editing the word Ahad by adding al al-ta3reef

1 - أحد : واحد : « الله الأحد ».

Allahu al-Ahad and Allahu Ahad this is what your sources tell us and do you know why they edited it? Because they know very well that the word without al al-ta3reef means ONE OF

How come you did not know that?

And here it is the Qur'an in suart al-An3am 19

قل انما هو الله واحد

If you remove the introductory clause you are left with the real sentence with its المبتدا والخبر and we have the الله واحد

So you see our dear Submitter it is either Allah made a mistake in Surat al-An3am or a mistake in surat al-ikhlas so which one is a mistake as it cannot be both? You tell me but it also could be that your Allah plagiarized it from some other language and as you shall see it is from Syriac

Now do you see why you have to learn Arabic grammar and as you shall see Hebrew and Coptic and Syriac grammar? But you aske dfor it

In the past God did not say he is one of why would he say he is one of in his final testament?

Your logic is flawed do you know why? Let me help you

1. It means that the Jews and the Christians (as you will find the Shema in the NT) did not corrupt their books as Allah claims so is that true our dear Submitter al-tablighee?

2. It means that the God of Islam is also the ethnic God of the Jews so is he the ethnic god of the Jews! Is that true our dear Submitter the lost tablighee?

3. It means that the God of the Nasarra is also the God of Islam as you shall see you will find the shema also in the NT

4. It also means that you do not know basic Arabic grammar as I just proved to you

5. It also means that there is an Allah! Where is your evidence?

6. It means that Allah knows Syriac and Hebrew and Coptic and Greek where is your evidence

7. It also means that there was indeed an Arabian warlord and caravan raider and Allah the Arabic speaker spoke to him via an angel where is your evidence? and where is your evidence that there are angels?

Hint: Because the Qur'an says so or because the moron Zakir Naik says so will not be accepted as evidence

8. And where is your evidence that the Qur'an is the "last testament" from the Arabian deity called Allah? Did you now know that Allah spoke to me too via an angel and I have a book for you

9. And why would Allah select the Hebrew/Syriac form of the word and why did he not select the Arabic form of the word Wahid? you tell us

10. And why would Allah tell us that it is Qur'an 3Arabi so who is the liar here?

And as i shall prove to you the author of the Qur'an plagarized

See? you are your worst enemy but again this is what Islam does to wannabe Arabs like you

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".