69 million page views

Just let Iran stew in its own juices, and don't de-list the MeK

Reader comment on item: Empower Iranians vs. Tehran

Submitted by Kepha Hor (United States), Jul 19, 2011 at 23:53

What's this ... about delisting the MeK? They were the first invaders of our Embassy in Tehran back in 1979. If they've moderated their anti-Americanism, it's only a cynical ploy to pull the wool over the eyes of a nation they see as being made up half of devils and the other half sheep. When the mullah-ocracy arrests and shoots an MeK, I'm about as moved as when a chicken-stealing hawk swoops down on a poisonous snake and eats it.

Ever since Hanun ben David disgraced the envoys of David of Israel in the early 10th century BC, disgracing envoys has meant that the culprit sees no other possible stance towards the other state besides war. As a group whose ideology is a mix of Marx and political Islam, the MeK cannot but hate the USA and its people for what they are; and any carping about America's making it impossible for southern Azerbaijan and Kordestan to join the fraternal embrace of Soviet Peoples back in 1946 or mistrusting Mossadegh for being a lion with the British and a crippled mouse towards Soviet oil concessions (and, BTW, out-and-out looting in Iran) is only window dressing. Hence, if the US government had any sense of dignity, every MeK who was ever allowed into the USA ought to be rounded up, stripped of citizenship after due process of law, interred, and deported to whatever country might take him.

Maybe the Iranian street is no longer angry at America's saving it from being the Soviet-run Afghanistan of the 1950's and '60's (which is exactly where the policies of their hero Mossadegh would've led). if so, I'll believe it when some Iranian government makes the first move in normalizing relations, and I will cheer and applaud if such a thing ever happens. But otherwise, the Iranian people have made it very clear on many occasions that they consider being martyred in conflict with "the Great Shaitan" to be their highest possible glory. Should the MeK take over in Tehran, any gratitude for the asylum their members received in the USA after 1980 would evaporate in a matter of nano-seconds. Hence, until Iran makes the first move towards normalization, it is incumbent on any US administration to state that it takes Iran' at her word when she professes a love of martyrdom, and should Iran make war on the USA or any of its allies, it will indulge such a love of martyrdom to the utmost, including the use of nuclear weapons. Further, the US government should make it clear that if any WMD is smuggled into and used inside the USA, Iran will be seen as responsible, and, if the Iranian government does not want its 30 most populous cities and most strategic sites go up in clouds of nuclear smoke, it had better do a very, very good job of policing Hezbollah, Hamas, and its other proxies.

Again, it is a disgrace that even a single member of the MeK was ever let into the USA.

And as for the Maryam Rajavi talking with Mayor Guiliani, wasn't she the "Mary" we saw so much of during the 444 days of the hostage crisis back in 1979? If so, why wasn't that filthy critter arrested for kidnapping? C'mon, Rudy! You're losing your touch!

Dislike (1)
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1are you serious? [118 words]emAug 5, 2011 06:13188045
the enemy of our enemy... [83 words]Evan MarkJul 27, 2011 16:30187754
1You need some eyes on the Iranian ground, Daniel [368 words]KevinJul 27, 2011 11:51187741
Tough Or Diplomatic [115 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mark D.Jul 25, 2011 19:51187701
2something is missing here ! [88 words]AliJul 23, 2011 19:06187650
question for DP [7 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
yuval Brandstetter MDJul 22, 2011 02:28187618
Libya and Iran [129 words]Mark D.Jul 23, 2011 23:20187618
1not comparable [146 words]Derar MarkJul 25, 2011 09:53187618
MEK [44 words]Lujack SkylarkJul 21, 2011 13:13187605
On increMental [67 words]Jay1Jul 20, 2011 21:25187585
1Just let Iran stew in its own juices, and don't de-list the MeK [549 words]Kepha HorJul 19, 2011 23:53187572
MEK is hated [12 words]aloJul 19, 2011 22:30187570
Topple the Mullah Regime [60 words]NuritGJul 19, 2011 17:07187563
6Acts of war went unpunished in 79 [55 words]Abu NudnikJul 19, 2011 17:01187562
carter was an antisemitic weakling [24 words]rick oneilJul 23, 2011 18:19187562
1Determining the True Power of the Iranian Islamic Revolution [380 words]M. ToveyJul 19, 2011 16:44187561
1Empower Iranians ... ? [54 words]FereydounJul 19, 2011 15:10187559
Fereydoun, is that really true? [171 words]Kepha HorJul 20, 2011 00:01187559
Principal of valeyat-a- [98 words]Steve BorkowskiJul 19, 2011 11:30187555
Did you forget that Obama is President? [345 words]john w mcginleyJul 19, 2011 10:13187551
1MeK vs. Iranians [234 words]Yek IraniJul 19, 2011 09:30187550
butting heads [223 words]Joe Six-PackJul 21, 2011 11:13187550
Innocent Americans ? [17 words]AliJul 23, 2011 19:36187550
Not innocent [133 words]Joe Six-PackJul 25, 2011 08:38187550
America Does Not Bear the Burden for Islamic Culpability [177 words]M. ToveyJul 25, 2011 16:38187550
Informative article [20 words]Mitra SamaniJul 19, 2011 03:58187543

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)