Please debunk the heck out of the debunker

Submitted by richard bloom (United States), Feb 11, 2012 at 13:41

Not in response to your 11 Feb weblog but this was the easiest way to reach you. Daoud Kuttab is not always outrageous but there are times he can hold his own with the best of the dissemblers. And when in need of a megaphone for his disinforming compulsions, the Huff Post always always obliges. Its standard audience is quick and indiscriminately eager to swallow just about anything intended to villify Israel and/or its supporters. Daoud is never out of his element there.

So, to the point, please apply your authoritative prowess and reach deep into your archival quiver for the truth honed weapons to "debunk" Kuttab's bunk besotted Huff Post post appearing on today's frontpage. I've copied it below for your convenience and, I anticipate, irritation similar to mine. Given the huge captive audience of both thoroughly indoctrinated, lopsided, left tilting partisans and unsuspecting empty vessels ripe for "special education" the Huff enjoys (and influences) influences as its new partner AOL's defauit "news" provider, the importance of near simulaneous rebuke and refutation is of the utmost importance.

Myth Debunked: Palestinian Textbooks Don't Teach Hatred 02/11/2012 by Daoud Kuttab.

Apologists for Israel's continued occupation and control over Palestinian lives have long contended Israel is more interested in peace than the Palestinians. One exaggerated argument, repeatedly put forward to justify military rule, is that Palestinians teach their children to hate Jews. Politicians in the U.S., especially during election campaigns, find that bashing Palestinians has no downside and yields a vote (and donation) jackpot. Palestinian textbooks are scrutinized for any hostile reference to Israel -- or praise for Palestinian nationalism -- and every frame broadcast on Palestinian television stations is analyzed by experts to see if it contains any incitement to violence. Palestinian-Israeli committees spent hours researching these issues and concluded that there is no textbook glorification of violence or hate. European and bipartisan American committees reached similar conclusions. But the anti-Palestinian attacks never stopped. All the efforts to respond scientifically and comprehensively to the unsubstantiated barrage of attacks failed to change the narrative that anti-Palestinian forces, especially in the United States, were keen on perpetuating. Self-declared professor and historian Newt Gingrich led the charge by negating Palestinian existence. Speaking on a Jewish online television station, Gingrich contradicted what the Israeli government did in 1993 when it recognized the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people. By cherry-picking historical evidence to back his convoluted argument, Gingrich claimed that Palestinians are an 'invented' people. A few days later when pressed by ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos, Gingrich repeated the blood libel against Palestinians by saying that Palestinian math books use killing Jews as part of their numeracy education. "They have textbooks that say, if there are 13 Jews and nine Jews are killed, how many Jews are left? We pay for those textbooks through our aid money." Of course, the textbook statement he referred to doesn't exist. The Associated Press went through the trouble of interviewing Israeli, Palestinian and American experts who have been deeply involved in the issue. Their conclusion was simple. According to researchers, Gingrich's claim --"is not in any of the texts." AP went further and stated, "A review of some texts by the AP, as well as several studies by Israeli, Palestinian and international researchers, found no direct calls for violence against Israel." Fact-checking sites, pundits and politicians failed to deal with the issue. And despite the AP story, no major American journalist, columnist, debater or think tank has called for or demanded that Gingrich admit and apologize for this brazen lie. The U.S. government, which until recently funded Palestinian ministry of education projects, didn't set the record straight even though the U.S. presidential nominee implicated the U.S. government in paying to print books that "teach terrorism." Still worse is what is happening in the U.S. Congress. A hold has been placed on U.S. funding for Palestinian health and educational programs. The hold, which was placed last fall by a Republican representative from Florida, is intended to punish the Palestinian Authority because its leader, Mahmoud Abbas, dared to ask the United Nations to recognize Palestine as a state Even more perplexing is what happened in early January when it was revealed that restrictions placed on money already approved and allocated by the U.S. Congress included holding money for the Palestinian version of Sesame Street. The Washington Post, NPR and other U.S. media outlets reported that $2.5 million committed for teaching Palestinian children tolerance and mutual respect was part of the hold instituted by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.). American politicians appear to be using precious little long-term thinking when it comes to Israel and Palestinians. Falsehoods declared on national television about textbooks are debunked by no one in the U.S. government. The silence appears to be less a consequence of ignorance than of fear. Politically, there is little to gain from saying an honest word regarding U.S. policy on Israel and Palestine. Consequently, the Republican-controlled Congress proceeds merrily on its course and holds up the funding that could rectify what experts agree is a non-existent problem of Palestinian textbook incitement. Bashing Palestinians remains an easy political pastime, especially at election time. It is tragic, however, that demagogic electioneering -- and outright lies -- can lead to the loss of responsible children's television programming for Palestinian kids. And it is telling that broader funding for Palestinian civil society can be closed off simply because Palestinian leaders asserted the right of Palestinians to live free in a state of our own.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".