The atrocity in Benghazi and a certain Abu Sufyan

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 23, 2012 at 11:54

Dr. Pipes

The more I check about what really happened in Benghazi the more I realize that we have not been told the truth and here is a character that was in Gitmo for five years and then he was sent back to Libya and his name is Abu Sufyan Ibrahim Ahmad Hamouda or ابو سفيان ابراهيم احمد حمودة and it seems that he told who ever was listening that he changed sides and he is now an ally of the US http://www.aawsat.com/details.asp?section=4&issueno=11837&article=618981 (the Arabic word haleef or حليف or ally) and our policy makers and diplomats believed him inspite of the fact that there is a little Islamic doctrine called al- taqiyya or holy lies

What a disaster

And here is a little biography on this sordid character http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Sufian_bin_Qumu and that he was involved in the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi and the murder of the late ambassador Christopher Stevens http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/19/top-administration-official-says-strike-in-libya-was-terror-attack/ and here is a reoprt from al-quds that this attack was pre-planned http://www.alquds.co.uk/index.asp?fname=today%5C21qpt960.htm&arc=data%5C2012%5C09%5C09-21%5C21qpt960.htm

It is sad that I have to read the arabic press to know what is really going on as it seems that our free press is not free anymore

And all we hear from Mrs Clinton is an apology to islamo'fascists and murderers and from the clueless Sarah Chayes telling us that we should limit our free speech and in reality the video has nothing to do with this atrocity

I'm sure that George Orwell must be turning in his grave

Oh next? Is clueless Sarah Chayes an islamophobe? it seems that she is and stay tuned for this one

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".