Is there something in the water supply?

Submitted by Jules Posten (United States), Sep 26, 2012 at 10:28

I recall a motion picture called "Wild in the Streets" where a few corrupt lawmakers in Washington, manage to change the voting age to 15 . then a new party arises, and somehow the water supply of Washington DC is laced with LSD, the next step was to have he same set of corrupt lawmakers, manage to get new laws in place, abetted by the "tripping solons" they next have a pop singer elected President. the new laws state that anyone who reaches 30 is forced into camps where the bill-o-fare is LSD in everything. the new youth President sets up a national police to enforce the new rules. if you don't comply willingly, you're dragged into the camps, where no body gives a damn about anything but the drugs being force fed. this idea spreads all over the world, and the picture ends with children in charge, and adults suppressed in the LSD camps.

why this film comes to mind, is the whole mess is began by a national media in thrall with the Youth President and complicit in the downfall of everything we believed in. let's look at the events of the past few weeks. we've had an American Ambassador murdered in a blatant terror attack that just happens on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, the worse attack on this country, since Pearl Harbor. our President calls the terror attack a reaction to some dumb video, which had come out months ago. a video no one ever heard about until it was used as an excuse for rioting, which served as a cover for a well executed military style attack on the American Ambassador. our President and Sec of State take a week before they figure out it was an actual terror attack, and even then the President calls the deaths caused, a "bump in the road"

the UN meets on a regular scheduled General Assembly" opening meeting. the President attends, but doesn't confer with other wold leaders on the unrest all over the world fueled by Moslems who are being told that everything is an insult to their religion. instead the President appears on some TV Show called the View, a female oriented talk show, where the panel gush over the President. after the show, the top of the panel, Joy Behar, makes a statement where she claims that the President would rather talk to her then any world leader.

next, we have the President's wife make a speech, where she calls the White House, where each leader has resided during his term. and where she's proud to be living, as an actual " slave built" home. the vice president has already made a speech, before a black audience where he calls a vote for the Republican nominee, a vote for a political party that has plans for putting "ya-all, back in Chains"

the national media never finds anything the current administration does or says worthy of any negative comment, while anything and everything the opposition says of does is held up for public examination, where it is usually subject to negative comment. the voters of this country have become completely confused. because of the media, no body knows where the truth lies.

just ask your self, are things better than four years ago? has the President followed through on his promises? does he appoint questionable people to be his advisors? does he and his advisor Sec Holder come up with some foolish policy on holding a major terror trial in a civilian court in Manhattan, where traffic, and business would be subject to a major jam up/ i could go on and on, but the basic question is ARE WE BETTER OFF THAN WHEN HE TOOK OFFICE?

based on his accomplishments, did the President earn and deserve another term? just think before you cast your ballot. make your voting decision based on your intellect, not what the media tells you. Just think about that film, and ask yourself is there something in the water?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".