69 million page views

SEND IN THE NUKES.

Reader comment on item: Foxbats Did Fly over Dimona

Submitted by DAVID J FEIGER (United States), Oct 17, 2012 at 01:53

The Soviet's role in initiating the '67 war has been known for years. The why has been an open issue. Was this a Soviet gamble to turn the heat up on LBJ . Bogged down in Nam , an anti war movement being seeded by professional students combining social reforms, ending women's hours with socialist ideals of combating colonial oppression. LBJ's CIVIL RIGHTS and WAR ON POVERTY legislation were dividing the country also. Why would a plan to attack a nuclear facility of a tiny state while fighting a war for survival unleash totally unforeseen consequences. Israel was respected, and seen as an innovative courageous nation defeating overwhelming aggressors to survive.

What today has been anti-semitically labeled Palestinian territory is Jewish and disputed. Perhaps the Soviets believed in Arab overwhelming force tp force LBJ to take action since France and Britian refused to honor their post Sinai war treaty to aid Israel. The West could not ignore a Soviet strike against Israel, the Red Sea, Suez and the Gulf might have ael. Cuba's accepted understanding could evaporate. A drawn out conflict affecting the Eastern Med, Red Sea, Suez and Gulf could have left the Kremlin in an passive appearing position while shaking LBJ's strategic defences. The antisemitic Israel haters in their personification of Orwellian mind control find a hit on Dimona great jew hating Iran loving propaganda.

i

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (19) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
SEND IN THE NUKES. [228 words]DAVID J FEIGEROct 17, 2012 01:53199871
A Call for More Research on the Role of State-Sponsorship in Conflicts More Generally [151 words]AlexNov 5, 2007 00:18113110
Saida 1982 [150 words]UgriSep 9, 2008 03:05113110
Daniel, please read The Fifty Year War [62 words]Tom DavisSep 21, 2007 19:10109408
Hiding [57 words]David W. LincolnSep 21, 2007 10:32109377
This stuff again? [155 words]Wayne WagnerAug 29, 2007 00:25107154
Of course this is not news! [47 words]MosheSep 2, 2007 06:56107154
The inability of the world to write about any event which exonerates Israel. [175 words]Mladen AndrijasevicAug 27, 2007 02:03107040
Dimona libel [91 words]jacob CH.Aug 28, 2007 12:38107040
Russian denial [92 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 25, 2007 17:54106974
1The lie is compounded [214 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDAug 25, 2007 14:34106970
The FOXBAT mission doesn't imply the Soviets instigated the 1967 war [206 words]Charles MartelAug 24, 2007 11:45106902
RTWT [35 words]Brian HAug 24, 2007 17:50106902
1Martel, you do not realize [202 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDAug 25, 2007 14:46106902
None of this implies the Soviets instigated the 1967 war to overfly Dimona [342 words]Charles MartelAug 27, 2007 11:21106902
Of course not! They overflew Dimona prior the 1967 war. [121 words]MosheSep 2, 2007 07:34106902
That is a different story, and plausible [133 words]Charles MartelSep 25, 2007 17:21106902
This was the story from its beginning, and as at last you correctly admitted: It is indeed plausible. [24 words]MosheOct 8, 2007 04:21106902
"Plausible" is a pretty weak statement, and I'm not blaming Israel for 1967 war [344 words]Charles Martel (the baffled)Nov 5, 2007 12:52106902

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)