Sorry Slayhy, History trumps your biased 'data'

Submitted by sara (United States), Dec 6, 2012 at 16:36

Sorry Slayhy, all you are doing is proving that your Quran is misleading you. Even YOU cannot dispute the FACT that the Torah, Old Testament and even the New testaments were all written way way way before the Quran. Regardless of who wrote them, the still precede the Quran.

I know you folks like to console yourselves with the notion that the Bibles were 'changed' and not 'original' while the wonderful amazing Quran is pure and untainted, but the truth is that the quran ripped off the ideas, the images, the laws, the peoples of the TORAH and recreated them for their own convenience. You must admit that Mohamed must have taken the stories from the bible or they would not be so ridiculously similar. And when they are SO similar, one must by necessity concede that the one written long before the other is the original story.

So if you acknowledge (and you must), that the bibles both preceded the Quran, then you acknowledge that the tales of the Quran were inexactly transcribed, or even twisted for political reasons (Mohamed's initial treaties with the Jews and then becoming enemies when they wouldn't cooperate). The Quran clearly tells the tale in the vast differences of the Mecca vs Medina writings. Or is it your contention that the Quran and Mohamed just manufactured these lineages out of the blue, without ever reading the Torah?

I wish I could say I was hopeful that you would agree, but I am not because your 'faith' blinds you and fills in the necessary reality so that you can maintain your beliefs.

So with that acceptance of this entire conversation as quite futile, I bid you goodbye and good luck.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".