Revelation Will Prove the Point of Israels' Preference

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Dec 13, 2012 at 16:45

As this was being written, it was pretty much thought nothing more need be said. Yet for the sake of others who may not understand the frame of reference of the contradicting thoughts, this further explanation of how the revelation of Biblical thought allows a disciple of Yeshua HaMashiach an ability to see what the LORD reveals as it pertain to the Middle East and Israel. What understanding Biblical logic does is answer the quip: "as if you know the logic of the Lord."

In a short answer, having the understanding of Biblical things does provide the insight necessary to take what the LORD says and know that He means what He says. Trying to insert human logic into that is where people get into trouble; thus we read in the previous post where it says … "when the Lord send (sic) a messages to the people He send(sic) a Message that people will understand, so His logic becomes human logic," an antithetical statement to be sure when compared to the Biblical imperatives.

Understanding the broader issues does not mean taking a Biblical imperative and impart human logic to make it read what you want it to. Yes, in Moses song we read of the prophetical implications of the people of Israel being deported out of their own country for disobedience; but they never lost ownership, only the possession. In those same passages, read to understand they were promised the land eternally and were promised to be brought back by their Eternal Sovereign. Human logic misses that part every time.

So, to reiterate, 'Palestine' will never inherit the promise to Abraham, for the LORD Himself is going to reinstate Israel in her final prophetic place in history.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".