Teaching lost tablighees how to read a document

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 20, 2013 at 08:28

Our dear GoD whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam and who lives among his Arab masters that regard his likes as no more than a maskeen men el-hind

you bring an old video and deceive people that it is new

Sure so what? and where did I date it? Let me help you I did not date it and do you know why? let me guess you have no clue right?

as someone commented this video was shot in 2009 after the murshid was elected and he was preparing his speech

Wrong again if you would have done your home work you would have discovered that Mohamed Akef the idiot that uttered the despiable sentence: Toz fi Masr was the Murshid between Jan 2004 and Jan 2010, and from 2010 until now the Murshid is the fascist Mohaed Badie so you read it in the comments by the posters and in the video that it is in 2009 which is not true because of the Islamic disaster I call be el-taqreeb or close enough! You have no clue about what I'm talking about right?

Now there is a word that you need to look up: Plagiarism now do you get it?

But you missed the point Morsi was not in charge and the person in charge was el-Murshid who seems to claim that he has a dierct phone line connection with Allah so is that true our dear GoD? and you know what? this is why Egyptians were saying: Yasqut hukm el-Murshid or down with the governing of the murshid and do you know why? because Egyptians realized and were told that the real man in charge was el-murshid and not clueless Morsi

Now do you get it?

Now you tell me why do you not do your home work before you post

what a disaster - is you

And speaking of disasters in the second part or my response I will review the Quranic disaster surat Yusuf 48 after all we are talking about Egypt

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".