Adddressing Muhammedism by Leftist ideology..

Submitted by donevan (United States), Oct 24, 2014 at 22:00

Why does Liberalism refuse to address the toxic dogma and doctrine of Muhammedism. In Leftist academia, politics, and media, the actual doctrine of I'slam, not "Radical" I'slam, but historical I'slam. While the abuses of christianity, in a doctrinal and dogmatic context, has been reformed into a benign, even beneficial force in those cultures where it is allowed to flourish. Not so with the Muhammedian model. This cannot be an accident. There must be a pervasive rationale for favoring I'slam over other belief systems.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".