69 million page views

Ebola, anyone?

Reader comment on item: How Serious the Strain in U.S.-Israel Relations?
in response to reader comment: Your crystal ball

Submitted by Michael S (United States), Apr 6, 2015 at 15:58

Daniel Pipes replies:

Let me not reply to the worst case but the most likely case: That Israeli and commercial relations with Europe will undergo considerable strain, but limited by the fact that Europeans want the goods (especially high-tech and medical) that Israel supplies.

I think it likely that the Saudi authorities will "look the other way" should Israeli jets transverse their territory on the way to and on the way back from Iran.

Whether the Europeans want Israeli goods or no, they will not change their stripes and start supporting Israel in the UN -- either GA or SC. France helped Israel substantially in the 1950s (when the US opposed Israel), but I think those days are gone.

With former Yemeni President Saleh in Russia and current President Hadi in Saudi Arabia (?), it looks as though both sides of the Yemeni war are now completely manipulated from outside the country. Saudi Arabia cannot afford to have an Iranian proxy of the same nature as Hizbullah on its southern flank; so I doubt that she will throw in the towel. Likewise, I doubt that the Russians and Iranians will allow a Saudi victory in Yemen, any more than they have allowed one in Syria. The Arab-Iranian proxy war, therefore, is likely to continue and intesify. Meanwhile, Pakistan has proved to be something of a fair-weather friend of the Saudis, so if the kingdom finds itself in a bind, it will have to look elsewhere. This will most likely NOT be to Mr. Obama, who is the archetype of bruised reeds, so I don't see anyone they CAN lean on, other than Israel.

Israel, on its part, cannot afford to allow an archenemy with first-strike nuclear capability to grow in the region. At some point, it will have to attack Iran. I don't see why the Saudis should not tacitly cooperate in this strike. Will they try to attack the Israeli aircraft? That would probably be foolhardy. Will they warn the Iranians? No. Will they warn the Americans? Yes -- a day or so AFTER the strike. Then, perhaps, they will lodge a protest that will get nowhere. Iran, in the meantime, will be weakened and humiliated.

I doubt that Saudi interference will be a serious obstacle to an Israeli strike. The timing will be determined by Israel, and Israel alone.

Oh, Mr. Obama has assured Israel that he "has their back". If I had Obama watching my back, that simply means that I would have to be concerned about an enemy behind me as well as in front of me. When Israel preemptively (or reactively) strikes Iran, I expect Obama to be outraged and verbally attack the Jewish state -- along with the Europeans et al. That's preferable to being wiped out by one bomb from Iran.

I don't think it's wise, to imagine too many scenarios for the Middle East, beyond that which is laid out already in the Bible. Israel is under God's protection, so we can be certain of the following:

1. Israel will survive

2. Her enemies will be humiliated.

The details are up to God. Every country in the world is vulnerable today. China's President is engaged in a continual purge of officials, because he doesn't feel safe in the palace. The EU faces possible monetary collapse, and the loss of major members such as the UK -- as well as the potential for anarchy caused by Islamist outrages and reactions thereto. The US is divided, as at no time since the Civil War; and there is a war here beneath the surface. Putin could easily go the way of the Tsar: Nobody is really insulated: All the world's leaders live in glass houses. Israel, on the other hand, is secure.

Ebola, anyone?

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (13) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
English-Speaking Union [319 words]Michael SApr 6, 2015 02:55222666
Your crystal ball [61 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Howard BrownMar 29, 2015 09:58222554
According to Yaalon it would take 2 weeks of sustained bombing of Iran [59 words]Shep FargotsteinApr 2, 2015 22:31222554
Ebola, anyone? [629 words]Michael SApr 6, 2015 15:58222554
Hoping for happy days [297 words]martin kesslerMar 29, 2015 00:42222546
Leave Them To Themselves. [257 words]Charlie G.Mar 28, 2015 21:10222538
sick joke [281 words]Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullahApr 2, 2015 01:22222538
The inevitable war [592 words]Michael SMar 28, 2015 16:52222535
War is good for these countries [198 words]Debanjan BanerjeeApr 5, 2015 11:56222535
Valuable (?) military skills [373 words]Michael SApr 6, 2015 03:30222535
too hot [182 words]Mohammed Waza Khiddif Id'ullahApr 6, 2015 06:14222535
1Debanjan should be careful about what he wishes for [125 words]PrashantApr 7, 2015 03:01222535
Dear Mr. Prashant [316 words]Debanjan BanerjeeApr 18, 2015 08:49222535

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)