|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes of StateReader comment on item: Jordan at the Precipice Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Mar 28, 2017 at 18:14 Even after stating that any solution other than Israeli sovereignty over any part of the Holy Land that is promised to Abraham, this review of a 'three state solution' suggests that some sense of political parity for all who might seek its plausibility will quickly come to a loss of reality: it will never work. The seeds of ummah have been planted so insidiously that the words mouthed by Abbas typically betray his subversive mind on the matter; and now he has a subservient UN vaunting his own preferences on this. Abbas cannot be expected to have consensus with the 'other Arabs' that make up the pre-Arab population that were not 'Palestinian' before 1947; for as it espoused here: why would they? Still, Israel can expect that other similarly determined forces will advance an agenda so steeply ingrained with the idea that Israel's preconceived vulnerability could allow a reverse in fortunes is actually so ill-conceived; that when they begin to advance on Israel and lose so badly, not even the most skilled media spin will be able to explain how they could have missed the greatest story ever told. The only truth about a three state solution is that when the ice melted into a liquid that eventually vaporized in milliseconds as the change of state occurred in the Middle East, only a remnant was left to experience the changed state of mind that it caused.
Dislike
Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (22) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |