No One Resolution for 'Palestinian' Solution

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), May 24, 2021 at 16:36

It appearing that the current American 46th Administrative Chief Executive or advisory leftist secularist staff have anything new to offer to gain any stability in the Middle East (it's not like they can move the embassy to achieve a new détente); where do the 'Palestinians' turn to now. Technically, they are out of options, they cannot plead to the Arabs since they were ignored in the Abrahamic Accords; there is no true affinity with the Iranian Islamic Regime's ambition since the Iranian a-lQuds leadership have nothing to offer Arabs in land the Iranian Islamic Regime can only hope to control (but never will). If then the premise to accept Israel as its own sovereign national identity (actually a fait accompli- it only needs recognition universally) becomes the operating function in rule of law and citizenship is determined in Israel like any other sovereign country and outsiders should leave well enough alone.
One would think in America this would be the dominant attitude; but the leftist socialist Democrats are trying to abort that premise here as well. Does anyone wonder why?
There is an answer, but no one will be willing to believe or accept it. American style republic form of governance worked in America, but no where else, not even in Israel. Thus citizenship is what ever can be defended and who is willing to defend it; and there is no unity for that in the democratic diffusion of today. Citizenship in that confusion will ever be defensible; see its impossibility in America. It does not work here; how does one expect it to work anywhere else?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".