|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
less safe with ageReader comment on item: Salman Rushdie Was Never Safe Submitted by myth (Germany), Aug 20, 2022 at 07:08 Salman was completely wrong when he believed the threat would go way with time. I think the exact opposite is true. When he was young there was plenty of time to murder him another day. His age creates some urgency for the potential murderer. What if Salman died from the natural causes of old age? Wouldn't that render the ultimately unexecuted fatwa irrelevant? Certainly his capacity to defend himself and to survive an attack would degrade with age as well. That would attract even the amateur murderer. In short, Salman at his age is like a low hanging fruit for those out to pick it quick before it falls by itself. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Daniel Pipes replies: What an original and interesting point. Reader comments (20) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |