To Sarah and Another one: Sarah was the legal wife.Hagar was the servant

Submitted by Armageddon (United States), Mar 1, 2006 at 19:57

Sarah comments:
"If we are copycats you are also copycats. You probably do not know that Torah came before the Bible. So you are the one who also lacks knowledge. "

Armageddon answers:

Again you are showing inaccuracies in your comments. I will explain to you something the origin of Muslims:
When I said Bible I meant the Hebrew Bible, since the name bible includes both, the old testament and the new one. Anyway:
Sarah was the legal wife of Avraham as described in the Hebrew Bible (Quran came later).

Both Avraham and Sarah were the parents of the jews, fact first mentioned in the Hebrew Bible. Therefore , Sarah is considered to be a biblical name and she is mostly correlated with Jews.

How many Muslim women are named Sarah ? I was just wondering...
On the other hand, Muslims have derived from Yismael, Avraham's older and "illegal" son, who was born by his servant Hagar. Therefore, Hagar, was the mother of Muslims and not Sarah who was the Muslim's step mother, but she was the true mother of the Jews and also the ancestor of the Christians.

It must be frustrating for you to hear this information and maybe because of that you are so aggressive (out of frustration). That could be the reason why you took the name of Sarah and not Hagar (from your comments I understood that you are a Muslim). Is there any Muslim girl by the name of Hagar ? Please tech me, I am not sure and I want to learn more… Your frustration also goes well with the theory that one of the participants in this blog had presented, explaining that European Muslims may also behave agressively because they are frusrated of not being able to live well in their countries of origin (like th Europeans do, SO FAR).
Jews and Christians are closer in origin (Jesus was a jew) and that is why, out of frustration, Muslims declared war against jews and cruciaders

Sarah comments:
"Ha ha ha ha ha..... well said, Armageddon! Either a small child or a clown can say such thing ! …... Next time I won't waste my time replying to someone with zero IQ !!!!!!"

Armageddon answers:
When you do not have sufficient intellectual tools to respond to comments, you are using personal remarks, which is infantile and quite pathetic.

Sarah comments:
"My little friend, this is the first and last time I am replying to your stupid comment"

Armageddon answers:
I am little but I am not your friend. I like you as much as you like me.
I'll bet you or your friends will respond to my comments. You see, it is a catch 22: your innate aggressive instinct pushes you to respond, since you are eager to convince everybody about your peaceful nature. On the other hand, you promised not to respond so you may want to maintain your promises. Interesting what are you going to do.

Sarah comments:
"Thanks Hind Samy, I know how you feel about this never ending hate campaign"

Armageddon answers:
I don't hate you. I think of the fanatic Muslims (who are a lot !) as predators.
When you see a predator you don't hate him. You analyze his behavior and keep distance, you try to avoid it.

AND THE LAST AND MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL SARAH COMMENTS:
"They control media and they use this strong weapon (other than their bombs, threats, sanctions etc) to demean and insult us. But they don't want us to talk back. They want us to shout on the streets and protest violently so that they can further use it for portraying us as extremists!"

Armageddon answers:
The words you just said, look to me as a threat/menace. You see my dear, a few words and you are already in a state of rage, menacing and threatening that you will:
"shout on the streets and protest violently" Why couldn't you say: "they want us to publish our protest" So you admit that "if we want, you are able to do this (protest violently).

And again, it doesn't matter who is better here, who knows more or less about the bible, the facts remain the same: Europe is lost.
Because, this is what you do, this is who you are……

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".