Interesting, but:

Submitted by M. al-Content (Portugal), Mar 13, 2006 at 16:56

Interesting, but:
Under Section 140, you might have to prove that the doctrines or worship of Islam had been mocked or insulted. The only genuine cartoon I have seen is clearly a reference to bombings by Muslims. To argue that bombings are acts of doctrine or worship might make for a difficult legal case.

Under Section 266-B, I do not think that two years would be considered long enough for the
Danish Imams to spend considering the error of their ways, and the harm they have caused.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".