Wild Wild West

Submitted by JustMe (United States), Mar 13, 2006 at 20:16

All I can say is look him up and see what kind of principles he has. There is the political side he presents and would like everyone to see, but look a little closer at the scandals, the money transferred to his wife, and also the money that was supposed to go to the little girl who needed surgery. There, again, is documented evidence of him taking money from Saddam.

It's not a pretty picture, and if Pilger is willing to overlook these things and say Galloway has principles, it's obvious he's not objective at all. Yes, both are anti-war types-- which I don't hate anti-war types-- I just feel unfortunately there are times for war. But some people get so wrapped up in the anti-war movement, they really lose any sense of reasoning because they just won't move from that position no matter what.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".