Another One

Submitted by JustMe (United States), Mar 16, 2006 at 18:07

So according to your version, there was no surrender. The Bani-Qurayza broke a treaty by helping other exiled Jews with food and supplies and stocking up on weapons in order to 'more than likely' sneak attack the defenseless Muslim's weak side. I don't know, Another One. Sounds like these Bani-Qurayza were correct -- They needed more weapons against such a ruthless warrior.

How can this be so different than what I read and everyone else read, seeing as I quoted from your own sources?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".