Apology accepted, Hind Sammy!

Submitted by Sword of Islam (United Kingdom), Mar 21, 2006 at 04:10

Ethnic cleansing? I don't see much in the way of alternatives so 'yes' I guess must be a skinhead. Hang on, 'bomb-turban head' is probably more accurate! I certainly wasn't before one the cartoon debate and realising that talking to you people was like banging my turban-head against a brick wall.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by Hind Samy, Mar 20, 2006 at 21:14
Before you try to twist this to your own interest, you mentioned people were dancing in the streets after 9/11 - well, it's FREEDOM OF SPEECH SWORD, like it or not.

Can't disgree with that. And this expression of free speech by such a large population
of your fellow believers was a clear expression of support for the actions that they
celebrated. So are you saying that they do not follow the same faith as you? Or are they
perhaps a little more honest than you are. My freedom of speech means that I am permitted
to freely condemn their actions. You will note that Europeans did not go on a rampage on the
streets of our capital cities to quite the same extent as the followers of the 'religion of peace' did
in the aftermath of a bunch of cartoons circulated by Danish imams.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by Hind Samy, Mar 20, 2006 at 21:14
You offer a link to an article in the Telegraph to support your never ending bickering on the forum:
But then you claim that the BBC and the Telegraph are not reliable sources of information

The more informed amongst us are aware of the fact that The Telegraph mistranslated an quote by the Queen of Denmark and that the BBC misreported the facts as regards the cartoon controversy. This is documented fact as per previous posts. I note that you do not question the acts of the Janjaweed and the atrocities committed by Muslims in a 50 year war that has claimed 2 MILLION LIVES - merely the source.

p.s. 'Bickering' requires more than one person
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by Hind Samy, Mar 20, 2006 at 21:14
For any passing readers who may be interested there is some useful info here:
http://atheism.about.com/od/islamicsects/

Surely anyone genuinely interersted in learning about a religion will find more accurate sources? At least sources that were written by people who actually practice that religion?.

- This says it all. The website is very respectful of Islam and has the benefit of being 'objective' - look it up. I realise that objectivity is a word that is alien to you but it is a benchmark of debate in the West

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funny that when I offered a definition to the word "Flamer" you were the one who commented on it - we have a saying in Arabic which goes along the lines of "he who has a bump on his head always touches it" - meaning when something applies to someone, they instinctively will be aware of it. You made fun of Libyan because he made a few mistakes in English - well, considering you're an Englishman and never heard of the word "flamer" and English is not my first language,

- More lies, Hindu Sammy? The fact of the matter is that JustMe was accused on more than one occasion of also posting as Sword of Islam. Using the wisdom of the Western phrase 'whoever smelt it, dealt it' I compared the grammar and phrasing of Libyan (whom we chased away from this board) with that of others. I noted that both you and Libyan used a word that I had never seen used by anyone else - flamer. I commented on this word that applies only to the internet and which is a recent invention and therefore not in wide usage by the rest of us. It therefore confirms that "he who has a bump on his head always touches it" as it is reasonably clear that you have participated in many such boards - presumably with as little effect. You offered a definition of the word. I thanked you for it. End of story.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted by Hind Samy, Mar 20, 2006 at 21:14
Sorry to everyone that this post was so long, but using more than one post to reply to people like "Sowrd of Islam" seems to me to be a waste of posts

A sentiment that you express with the majority of your posts yet one that you have a singular inability to follow. Your 'word' obviously means nothing but who said it ever did?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".