Anonymous, by name & nature

Submitted by Sword of Islam (United Kingdom), Mar 27, 2006 at 17:04

Submitted by Anonymous, Mar 26, 2006 at 11:57
However, my point was not that. Sarah and I are two different individuals and so we can have different opinions on a subject.

- Ah, I understand. You are unable to understand the fact that a person can be convinced by another person's argument and change their viewpoint accordingly? You understand that two people can have differing views yet are unable to comprehend that one viewpoint can affect another? This explains a great deal. Sarah explained that my comments regarding Judaism and Christianity were nonsense and I was convinced by her argument that she was correct. After all, she has no motivation for deceit in such a matter. Does your inability to believe that such an argument could sway another indicate a) your contempt for her words or b) a closed mind on your part? Are you confessing that you have a 'closed' mind and are unable to understand the concept of an open one? I'm a little confused by your failure to understand this! Is the fact that the New Testament (telling as it does the stories of Christ) has considerably more impact on a Christian than the Old Testament really that perplexing?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".