Opinions, not facts

Submitted by American-Israeli (Israel), May 9, 2006 at 17:00

"it may be presumed that they had solid grounds for their conclusion."

You are committing a common fallacy of conspiracy theorists - you are assuming that yours is the ONLY possible explanation.

Did you consider that maybe they simply assumed, like virtually all the other commenters here, that it "couldn't have been a mistake". Surely you could have asked them what their opinions were based on - if it was classified information, they would have reacted accordingly. In any event, without further evidence, your assumption is just that - it is logical, BUT IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PROOF.

If you are so concerned on releasing material, why don't you or Mr. Ennes file a FOI lawsuit on the issue?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".