to Vijay

Submitted by G.Bisvas (Germany), May 29, 2006 at 04:58

To Vijay

You know what a chimera is. Recently they created one by mixing the fertilised egg of a goat with that of a sheep and letting the two grow together in the same womb. The result was a chimera (kid+lamb) with 50% goat cells and 50% sheep cells. Being an indian and simultaneously being a muslim is like this. In case of sheep+goat it works somewhat. In case of islam+indianness it does not work - even if one keeps believing the pseudo-secular hoaxes perpetrated by indian politicians.

The nationalism and patriotism (and honesty) of muslims has its limits - the muslims themselves will tell you this. The superior loyalty of a muslim is and must be with islamic-arabic imperialism and sharia fascism. It cannot be otherwise. Muslims are allowed to practise takiya (=dissimulation, pretensions) in order to fool the non-muslims so that the non-muslims lose alertness about the islamic threat and thus the task of the agents of islam becomes easier.

All muslims are not bad - but that is not a result of islam, but because most of them dislike islam but are too scared to say so openly. The liberal muslim is however neither able nor wiling to tackle the problem of islamo-fascism. In fact he deals with it very opportunistically. If islamo-fascists strike he expresses regrets about the "hijacking" of islam but then, after some time of shame and forgetting the tragic events, claims his share of the loot gained by them without winking an eye.

Mr. Vijay I am sorry to inform you that you are naive and you do not seem to grasp the evilness and tricky-ness of islam and its agents and quislings.

Maulana A K Azad has no following among the muslims of India. Even the indian government takes care not to mention him so as not to hurt the feelings of muslims (in India only the feelings of the muslims are worthy of not being hurt, isn't it?). The demographic aggresion of muslims (from 6.5% to 15% population component in 59 years) goes on and on.

MKGandhi directed the "quit india" movement (1942) against the british. British imperialism brought India in 150 years more net benefits than 800 years of islamic hegemony. Why did he not say "quit india" to the quislings of islamic-arabic-turkish imperialisms? He was a coward and an appeaser. He himself said once that the muslim is by nature a bully (quoted by his own beloved grandson Rajmohan Gandhi).

Fact is we have been too soft and lenient-fair to the muslims and they have misused our tolerance and ignorance for their own fascist expansionist goals. With naive hindus like Mr. Vijay to help them they are on their way to become more demanding and deceitful and arrogant. That even neo-buddhists, dalits and communists do not (wish to) see the tricks and lies of islam but try to form political pacts and street-gang-like squads with muslims (or in imitation of muslims) - that will prove to be tragically expensive for India in the coming years.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".