Peace be upon us - but on our terms!

Submitted by Thomas Justin Kaze (Australia), Aug 30, 2006 at 04:02

Peace be upon us – but on our terms!

What else are we to do in order to please Muslims? Convert to Islam, so that they feel more welcome upon arrival in our lands? Build a mosque on every street corner and maybe even pull down churches, synagogues and temples, so that our distinguished guests do not feel offended by our multi-cultural culture, so alien to their exclusively mono-cultural mentality, so that they do not feel endangered, exposed to the evil of the infidel West, excluded, vilified, distrusted and paid too much unwanted attention to?

Or are we, perhaps, to accept their "superiority" (excuse me?) and allow them to turn the achievements of our civilization into dust and impose upon us whatever it is that have to offer? Or shall we impose (sorry – introduce) the barbaric Sharia law, so that the disenchanted Muslim youth can legally get away with assault, rape and murder, while their female victims get lapidated to death for making "baseless" accusations against "hot-headed", grossly misunderstood, innocent and very religious boys? Just imagine us moving into their lands and carrying on like they do in ours – how long would we last for?

They demand their right to proselytize their ideology to us, civilized people, insisting that we all go down to their level, only because they are not willing – or able – to crawl up to ours. The fact that we have tolerated various Socialisms or Satanisms or even Islam does not give Muslims the right to dehumanize us and take us to the realm of the VII Century Arabia; to the contrary – we have the right to expect of them to become fully human, if they want to live among us.

A dialogue with Muslims – what an absurd idea; what peaceful coexistence or a dialogue with them can be possible, when they stubbornly try to impose their primitive and barbaric views on us, threatening with violence when refused? And our dear Leftists chime in and call us names, when we insist on going forward, not backward. A dialogue? They want to do the talking, while we do the listening; if we fail to accept their terms, Mr. Ahmadinejad (Antarinejad!) will nuke us (Allah'u akbar!), so that there is nothing but Islam, ion the world. When we resist Islam, we are being accused of bigotry and hypocrisy; when we prove too strong and they cannot subdue us, we are "oppressing" them; fighting our War on Terror, we are serving the Satan and waging war on G-d, as terror=jihad and there can be no Islam without jihad. Resisting jihad is, therefore, resisting G-d; the same silly Al-Ilah, who claims to be omnipotent, but is, as a matter of fact, so impotent that he cannot snap his fingers and turn the whole infidel world into a totalitarian Caliphate, or obliterate it in a fraction of a second. ...– directed at Jews in particular, as Jews were the most inventive, industrious and self-sufficient people in the Middle East from time immemorial, even 2000 years BC, when the ancestors of Muslims still lived in the trees. What did Muslims invent, what did they contribute to the humanity, except for bloodshed and misery? Not much; just key in on Google and you will see. This is the true face of Islam – everything else is a fabricated lie.

If we do not accept their terms – there will be war; and, of course, we will be guilty of it; our resistance is a sin, according to the Qur'an. The Islamic strategy is clear: "Stop defending yourselves, so we can subjugate or kill you; if you do not allow us to win, we will call you racists! Your superiority is offensive to our culture!" Political Correctness, too, apparently means that you are under obligation to allow inferiors to defecate on your head, without uttering one word of protest. As an idiot once said, "wars do not happen because one country invades another, but because the invaded country fights back" – in other words, revere the invader and slander the defender. No offense meant, but even the late John Paul II urged his flock to "reconcile with Muslims" (on whose terms?) and kissed the Qur'an, the handbook for solifidian murderers and pedophiles – and I was lost for words. Similarly, many men of the cloth in the West share his opinion. Treachery and conspiracies, it seems, know no bounds and come from the most unexpected directions.

Muslims kill tens of thousands of their own brothers and sisters, while blaming it on the West – or better still, Jews – just like every other misery that they and their backward ideology and philosophy are the only source and cause of. And, for as long as jihad remains a part of it, Islam should be banned. Why do the United Nations, and Mr. Kofi Annan in particular, keep silent; why does Mr. Annan come up instead with his crazy idea of "proportionate response" by Israel – meaning that the total annihilation of 6 million Israelis would come at a cost of mere 6 million Muslims? How can we explain the fact that Muslims from Indonesia and the Philippines, who have never seen a Jew, call for death of all Jews? I recommend the article "Proportional response…" on the Faith Freedom site.

Hypocrisy? That's being a non-Muslim; oppression? That's resisting an inferior Muslim aggressor. The Crusades? Oh but the Crusades happened long after the Muslim invasion of Europe; you can check with the historical sources – history has never been politically correct. And what, the infidels covet Muslim lands? What a nonsense; nobody wants their barbarism or their sands. Oil? Very soon, they will be trading it with us for water, a barrel for a barrel. The Qur'an says "G-d loves the stronger" – very well then, let us be just that – stronger!

So, whoa, Muslims; you want to invade… sorry – immigrate to our lands, populate at our expense and outnumber us? Please remember how China has solved her overpopulation problem; we cannot promise that such laws will never be introduced in our lands, for the sake of our survival. Of course, you are still at liberty to populate like rabid rabbits in your Islamistan-Terroristan – just do not send your surplus of maniacs to us!

Are we really profiling Asians? No, we are not: Hindus or Buddhists do not pose any threat to us; we are profiling Muslims, and justly so; all terrorists, in recent years, have been Muslims. No, it is not some "racial profiling" – people of all nations, nationalities or races have – or not have – Muslim names. Bosnians, Chechens and Albanians are Caucasians. Profiling, eavesdropping and surveillance are not means of persecution – they are our legitimate means of self-defense. We have been too patient with Muslims and their outrageous claims and demands, only for too long. Do you want to know my opinion as for what we should do with Islam? No, I don't think you do – and neither does CAIR.

Thomas Justin Kaze

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".