For annonomous and is her Allah really really raouf?

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 23, 2006 at 19:07

My dear annonomous your logic is flawed.

Your Allah would have been raouf if little boys would be born with no foreskin. But it seems that according to your flawed logic your Allah discovered his mistake (boys being born with foreskins) and is trying to correct his mistake, and in the process subject little Muslim boys to such torture.

And why was his rasul aka Abul Qasim aka Muhammad not born with foreskin or this what we have been told? Did Muhammad have hypospadius?

The chances are your ancestors were not even Arab and you still defend the religion that brutalized your ancestors: Shame.

You are a victim of poor Muslim education.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".