re:amir's rant

Submitted by snake (United States), Dec 2, 2006 at 02:13

Please notice the difference in thought processes. once hostilities start, amir goes off on a revenge, dignity of revenge, and respect tangent. all of which involve killing, whereas western thinking goes "how can we resolve our differences?"

this is why radical muslims will never rise above caveman status, and never add to the society of mankind. It would appear they prefer to drag mankind back to the stone-age where their simplistic "obey what i say god says" philosophy would have some fascist validity. It would behoove even moderate muslims to take them at their word, and do what they can to defeat this thinking, because if they(the radical muslims) were to get the upper hand, they would surely turn on moderate muslims, and eventually upon each other, until all that was left on earth were the 3 or 4 factions of radical muslimhood that were left, destroying mankind and the earth in the process.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".