Our dear Anglea needs to get her money back from her madrassa

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 14, 2007 at 20:34

You wrote

>The Koran (sic) teaches that the people of the book namely the Jews and Christians

So you tell us ya yauha al-faylasoofa al-kabeera (and yes this is sarcasm) where does it say in the Qur'an who are really ahl al-kitab or the people of the book? Let me help you; The Qur'an that opaque revelation does not define who are really ahl al-kitab. It was the 3Ulama in the 3rd century of Islam in distant Mesopotamia and Iran that decided that this strange ahl al-kitab thing must be the Jews and Christians.

However, our dear Karen Armstrong another wannabe Arab like you believes that ahl al-kitab includes Hindus and Buddhists.

>and other servants of the one and true God

So congratulations our dear Angela, but it seems that Rama and the Buddha are your Allah too.

>recognized by muslims and called Allah or God

But our dear Angela your "EDUCATED" Muslim friends tell us that the word Allah is a contraction of the words al-Ilah or the god and God as you claim. Should I believe you or should i believe them? What do you think our dear Angela?

>are not technically infidels

Bogus. If you read Qur'an 9:5 where your allah says: Iqtolu al-mushrikeen or kill the polythiests, then go to Q9:30 where your allah says that the Jews consider 3Uzair as the son of God (sic) and the Christians consider Jesus as the son of God. Do you know what this means? it means that your allah is telling you that Jews and Christians are poyltheitsts and if you do not believe you can read Ibn Qatada's exegesis (tafseer/ta'weel) of the above two ayas! and this is as early as you can get in islamic tafseer.

You claims are just as bogus as your knowledge of islam the religion of peace (sic) that is

Stay tuned for more.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".