Our dear Ahmad and fantasy

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 16, 2008 at 09:46

If you read the sira you come to the clear conclusion that Abul Qasim aka Qutham aka Muhammad aka Ahmad was nothing but a caravan raider and an Aarbian warlord. His biography by al-Waqidi is called al-Maghazi or the invasions! He for sure was not the Buddha.

And why is all this violence and wars when your Allah can spread his Arabian religion with out any violence unless your Allah is not omnipotent. So is your Allah not omnipotent our dear Ahmad? And why does he ask you to "qatil fi sabeel Allah" and why would your Allah and his rasul demand that they must collect 1/5 of the loot collected from us infidels? And how could you get such loot to your Allah collected through violence by Muslims against us al-kuffar in the past 1400 years.

But you know what? There is nothing historical about the sira except in the minds of people like you.

And like I say: you are here defending the religion of the arabs that brutalized your ancestors and for this I say, shame.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".