69 million page views

Intelligence agencies share intel

Reader comment on item: Next Time Someone Gets Indignant about Israeli Spying on the United States ...

Submitted by brendan doran (United States), Apr 27, 2008 at 22:39

Intelligence agencies share intel-that's most of their job, deeds of daring-do aside. So I would be wary of prosecutions unless it's rank treason, which Pollard was.

Israel and the US undermine each other enough without starting a pissing contest about...nothing.

Remember as well there will be no outrage and little media notice (unless it's to piss on Israel) on the US side. No one here will care about the fate of Yosef Amit. Pollard of course unwisely keeps coming up in negotiation because it's a big deal in Israel. The US does not take lightly espionage, especially if they push to conviction. It's a big deal over here, remember the bipartisan outrage when Wen Ho Lee got off on technical grounds.

It's worth nothing to Israel to push back. It would gain nothing but ill will amongst the General Public, we will never release Pollard. As the above implies, there is already a great deal of ill will amongst the elites (CIA in this case). Don't tick off Ma and Pa America over a snitch.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
I think there's a difference between electronic hacking and turning a government employee into a spy [41 words]AnonDec 11, 2016 12:30234645
I don't think it's similar to Pollard [69 words]Anon.Jan 31, 2016 16:16227884
Spying on Israel is wrong! [43 words]Butch JocsonDec 21, 2013 13:23212259
Lets Swap Spies [17 words]PeteJul 8, 2013 23:21207989
Most intelligent statement of Obama's [69 words]keithJul 7, 2013 09:08207950
question for Doctor Pipes [48 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
rafiFeb 25, 2012 13:17193631
2Why? [21 words]Daniel FlanneryMar 21, 2013 10:01193631
All they had to do was ask [74 words]yuval Brandstetter MDJan 24, 2011 16:06182018
Who doesn't spy? [67 words]AnnaMay 6, 2008 02:11127841
Of course NOT !! [188 words]Alexander MunchMay 2, 2008 06:03127432
1Please clarify [16 words]Daniel FlanneryMar 21, 2013 10:05127432
Paul Arcand Quebec Journalist [81 words]obzerbatorApr 30, 2008 08:45127255
Confusing [112 words]LynnApr 29, 2008 10:51127166
1Poor Choice of Example [54 words]havapilotApr 28, 2008 14:32127086
Well said [16 words]Daniel FlanneryMar 21, 2013 10:18127086
Spy issue and the conspiracy theory [68 words]obzerbatorApr 27, 2008 23:08127005
Intelligence agencies share intel [175 words]brendan doranApr 27, 2008 22:39127001
1Not really [60 words]Daniel FlanneryMar 21, 2013 10:24127001

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)