Dr. Pipes, I agree completely with your opinion regarding Obama's socialist and Muslem bias for the US

Submitted by Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D. (United States), Jan 26, 2009 at 10:12

I have followed your outstanding work throughout the years, informing the public and the authorities about the "Arab Peril", Islamism and the blindness of the majority of officials here and abroad. I have communicated with you about this, and with the other members linked to your group, who also work at fighting to tell the truth about Israel's position and the bias of the media and the government in the US, in the UN, in Europe and elsewhere.

Yes, I too believe that Obama is driving the US into socialism; perhaps this is why he was getting on very well with the French president... Now that he has the power to make the decision for the nation, he is flashing his Arab origin and courting the enemy of Israel openly. His choice of Mitchell as the US Ambassador in the Middle East is a blatant proof that we can expect "more of the same" inertia regarding Arab hegemony here and in the rest of the world.

At least under the Bush administration, we were a Judeo-Christian country, and Bush was firm in his pro-Israel policy. Obama does not even have an official Middle East Affairs oversight group, such as the one Bush had, headed by an expert; you were appropriately nominated for this position by the US President, and the US President's position was openly on the side of Israel.

When the public hysteria over Obama, now Obama Hussein, starts to wane, it will be a long time to reverse this mistake. I hope that Israel will teach all the Obamas of the world a lesson of strength and courage, as it always has in the past, and find allies elsewhere. It is time for all the Jews to unite in Israel and abroad and take a stand.

Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".