Not Christian enough

Submitted by jo (United Kingdom), Sep 1, 2012 at 15:34

George Bush became president first time around in a contested election. People told that he was elected by God not by americans. Then he started war of terror against muslms (21st century crusade). He invaded iraq based on WMD lie and managed to massacre up to a million iraqis for the crime of being ruled by a brutal dictator who fought a fraticidal war with Iran on the order of his western masters. Then he invaded and started massacring villagers in mud houses over mountains in afganistan and pakistan. This action made him popular in US. Second time he was elected by popular vote without the help of God.

Since election, obama tried to convince americans of his christian credentials. He continued troop action in afganistan, not only that he actually did the surge with bombing of villages, schools and marriage parties. But he still failed convince americans that he is christian. More and more people started believing that he is a muslim. So he not only continued Bush's drone murders, which is a " high tech kill a muslim game" played out from CIA game station at Nevada. The game targets stone age people in the mountains of afghanistan and pakistan, mainly women and children. Their crime being in the vicinity of "suspected" terrorists. The game is very popular in US as this is a fight between civilized western judeo-christian people of goodness against primitive devil worshipping savage people of muslim faith. Obama's drones have now killed many hundred thousands people making him eligible for Nobel peace prize. But americans think that he has not spilled enough blood to be a true christian. The only way now left for him to prove his christian credential is to bomb Iran and initiate another blood bath in line with Bush's iraq invasion.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".