69 million page views

problems, of course, but the election results are promising

Reader comment on item: White Elephant in Baghdad

Submitted by Jeff (United States), Mar 30, 2010 at 16:00

Dr. Pipes is absolutely correct to complain about the catastrophic waste or American taxpayer money in connection with catastrophically mismanaged invasion and occupation of Iraq, as well as the poor decision to build such a large embassy complex. But why complain about these long-standing problems at a time when the Iraqis elected a secular political figure who is surely not an Iranian client.

If al-Maliki had been reelected, then one would be much more justified in claiming that "the mullahs in Teheran will begin their takeover." It seems clear that most Iraqis, including the Shi'i, are opposed to the growth of Iranian influence and power in their country, which is a very good sign indeed.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
U.S. Once Again Provokes and Incites Via Appropriation -- And Not Sale By the Iraqi Government & People [448 words]Renee BouvierFeb 8, 2012 18:49193222
Now AP is reporting on the wasted millions in Iraq [18 words]AmesAug 29, 2010 15:55177432
Fact checking: what is the source of your information? [343 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
EuniceMay 15, 2010 17:03172728
Grand Designs for Democracy [169 words]The Masked LobbyistApr 28, 2010 15:43171811
The US Embassy Baghdad & the Election result; a different perspective [953 words]Sandy dazeApr 4, 2010 22:29170948
Iraq [51 words]Joe Six-PackApr 3, 2010 12:57170909
Maybe Iraqis weren't suited for Democracy... Yet. [101 words]HansApr 5, 2010 14:05170909
On the other hand [122 words]yuval Brandstetter MDApr 1, 2010 14:51170860
White elephant [165 words]moApr 3, 2010 13:32170860
Yuval Brandstetter's suggestion is right on the dot [315 words]PPSApr 3, 2010 15:09170860
2White elephant [128 words]Charles LightApr 1, 2010 06:28170844
Typical, unfortunately. [24 words]Jack KinchMar 31, 2010 16:00170830
The trailer manufacturer, a Saudi company [36 words]yuval Brandstetter MDMar 31, 2010 13:12170826
Why were we there in first place? [291 words]BruceMar 31, 2010 11:19170821
I agree with you but I have addition [51 words]Sohel Ahmed BahjatMar 31, 2010 09:42170818
Absurd embassies [59 words]JamesMar 31, 2010 09:15170817
Iraq, What's Next? [185 words]Leonard MarkowitzMar 31, 2010 07:14170815
This is the building standard for the Middle East [406 words]Ken Besig IsraelMar 31, 2010 01:24170799
Plain Common Sense [89 words]ZentristMar 31, 2010 00:07170798
Different Opinion [42 words]Craig JohnsonMar 30, 2010 23:26170796
1If the complex is kept, maybe part of it could be a school to teach Iraqis about democracy and freedom. [47 words]Phil GreendMar 30, 2010 22:46170794
Not just a white elephant [161 words]Rebecca MouldsMar 30, 2010 19:52170791
Deviation of CAsh [151 words]T & JMar 30, 2010 19:11170789
problems, of course, but the election results are promising [115 words]JeffMar 30, 2010 16:00170783
In my honest opinion. [26 words]WinstonMar 30, 2010 15:11170780
Reality is in the eye of the beholder [61 words]paul GertzMar 30, 2010 14:10170777

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)