|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Constructive communicationReader comment on item: Further Thoughts on Koran Burning Submitted by Viiit (Taiwan), Sep 28, 2010 at 18:03 "I can think of no instance, including the one at hand, when book burning is a constructive act. Thus, I called it distasteful." Of course in a literal, and in the strictly logical sense burning anything is destructive. In this case it is destroying a copy of Koran. Even that is not 100% true, as destroying a building, creates an open space (and an opportunity to construct a park). In this case, it is clear that the Pastor's intention, was a symbolic speech, rather than the preventing anyone from reading Koran. If anything more people may get interested in reading it. His message is as "constructive" as drawing the cartoons of Muhammad. Moreover the reactions to the intended burning created reactions in the Muslim world. That's constructive, as it powerfully illustrated the very point you were making in your article. Much of our political correctness is dhimmitude out of fear for Muslim violence. Our condemnations of burning of Koran, or of the Danish caricatures, or of "Everyone Draw Muhammad Day" are all due to fear of Muslim riots. Burning the Koran, brings this violence out to the surface. It is better to bring out this violence and make it visible, than to cower before it and give in. Ultimately we will have to acknowledge that the Muslims are our enemies. Yes, THE Muslims, not some "radical" Muslim, or the "Islamist". I would love to see the Nazis rioting and killed each other, over burning of the Mein Kempf, likewise with the Muslims. Submitting....
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". << Previous Comment Next Comment >> Reader comments (33) on this item
|
Latest Articles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |