Cherry picking time and charity starts at home

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 25, 2011 at 14:06

Our dear Naushad whose Hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam and now he is a follower of deen al-irhab wa rab al-irhab wa rasul al-irhab

Oh darn it the Arabic!

>I dont deny that mullahs rape boys, but my whole contention is why point to sexual crimes in muslim countries where you'l probably get 250 boys raped,

Where is your reference that only 250 boys were sexually abused? Let me guess you are making things up and how would you feel as a parent if one of those 250 boys was your son? you tell us

So you tell us how many deobandi/tablighee mullahs were arrested and put in jail for sexually abusing those 250 boys? Now it is your chance to shine our dear Naushad the wannabe Arab

>when the rape crimes in the west outnumber that in muslim countries by a factor of 1000. Google---- rapes in the US---- and you'l get the figures, easy. Then there are the 10 of thousands of sex slaves imported into the US. Then there are the 25% females who have been raped in the US military. Check it out, it may open your eyes a bit. Then there are the RC priests who rape boys and women as a matter of priestly duty.

Oh the priests! You see Mr hypocrite charity starts at home so go after the depbandi/tablighee mullahs the criminals that abused your 250 boys first before you lecture us but you know what? it will not happen and this is why the west is far superior to islam as no one is above the law not even a priest or a mullah and you know what? there is a case in Florida where a 35 year old Egyptian Skeikh was put in jail becuase he sexually abused a boy in his mosque and I can assure you that if this would have happened in Egypt he would have been able to get away with it

>Need I say anymore.

Say what anymore? ...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".