And more drama in the gay sex in the cause of Allah

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 29, 2012 at 17:34

Dr. Pipes

Benjamin Doherty of EI is saying that this strange fatwa must be a hoax because those that post comments on youtube realize that it is a hoax and that if we check the comments by Arabs watchers then we will get a "LOL" and no more

For the readers and for those of you that can speak read and write Arabic I urge you to check the posts by those that posted comments about this strange fatwa http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fE3QdV5eaeo&feature=related and at the reposting of the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXLBs7-Xpzs and you will find wahhabis attacking shi3a and shi3a attacking the wahhabis and everyone is after the usual suspects "the Juice" but a "LOL" as Doherty says you will not find and here is a sample

..هاذي فتاوى القاعده اخوان الشيع

Or there are the fatwas of al-Qa3ida the brothers of al-Shi3a

And here is another one

تخيلات شيعي يهودي ما له اي قيمه

Or "these are" the imaginations of a shi3a (whose is) a Jew and he has no value

Oh this is the balme the Jew and the Sh3i tow in one

And here is another one

أعوذ بالله ان كان هذا الكلام صحيح ومااتوقع احد بيسوي كذا غير الارهابيين اللي يلبسون الحق بالباطل.

Or I take refuge in Allah if this is correct and i do not expect anyone to do that except the terrorists that dress the truth with the bad

And here is another one

على فكرة هذا الموضوع طرح بالمنتدى لأظهار ضلال بمن يسمون انفسهم مجاهدي القاعد

Or by the way this is (the fatwa) this subject was addressed in el-muntada (muntada asood al-sunna web site where the fatwa appeared) to expose the stray of those that call themselves the holy warriors of al-Qa3ida

I do not see any LOL's!

Care to comment Benjamin if you can read Arabic?

For the readers: Doherty is trying to plug a leaky dyke and he has no luck

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".