69 million page views

threat to europe today and next week

Reader comment on item: Assessing the U.S. Global Military Force
in response to reader comment: So what is the implication for the current threat?

Submitted by myth (Germany), Jan 24, 2012 at 06:39

Stanley, special police forces respond to terrorist attacks inside and outside of Germany. That is the job of the GSG9 who has some reputation within the middle-east terrorist community. Anything on the scale of the Madrid bombings would prompt a very serious nationwide response from law enforcement, let alone the population's anger. The legal basis for such a response has always been grounded in german law.

The threat next week is certainly long range missiles coming from Iran reaching european targets. A situation similar to the Hisbollah firing missiles across the fence into Israel. However the threat to Europe is not discussed in the media. The historical standard has been pushed to new limits by the broadcasting of the US invasion in Iraq. That firepower and swiftness exceeds a WW2 scenario. Even tomorrow's threats appear small compared to televised US firepower. Maybe that accounts for some of the indifference in Europe.

Here in Germany there is an emotional side to this. Politicians avoid the word "war" associated with german armed forces like the plague. They talk about the "Afghanistan mission" or use some other constructs. (There is also no casualty-counting.) Should ever any threat become immediate, the chancellor would use the word "war". That is a word not to be softened by adjectives like "defensive","preemptive" , "necessary" and the like. There is some invisble but sharp line here. You in the US need not worry.

Dislike
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Wage & Win War When Need Be [58 words]infosifterFeb 6, 2012 18:25193152
1Dobbs disrespectful [66 words]JayJan 22, 2012 11:14192734
1Assessing the U.S. Global Military Force [188 words]JudithJan 17, 2012 14:21192655
1US army serving muslims [37 words]L. ManoharJan 30, 2012 07:27192655
3If you want Peace, Prepare for War [25 words]saraJan 13, 2012 17:29192568
2the unexpected and sending the wrong message [165 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
mythJan 11, 2012 07:21192482
The Unexpected and sending the wrong message [395 words]Leonard MarkowitzJan 17, 2012 08:28192482
effectiveness and efficiency in conflict situations [213 words]mythJan 18, 2012 08:34192482
2Evolution results in instinction? [41 words]sarryJan 18, 2012 18:14192482
So Israel should be the mark? [54 words]saraJan 18, 2012 18:17192482
1So What can be done? [56 words]stanley bJan 21, 2012 16:21192482
2Arrogance of the West [131 words]stanley bJan 21, 2012 16:26192482
No more Dutch tanks is a disaster? [100 words]RobertJan 22, 2012 03:10192482
1military defense - german perspective [169 words]mythJan 22, 2012 14:58192482
So what is the implication for the current threat? [88 words]stanley bJan 22, 2012 17:57192482
if there only had been one Dutch tank [97 words]mythJan 24, 2012 05:56192482
threat to europe today and next week [235 words]mythJan 24, 2012 06:39192482
Looking Down the Barrel of an Abrams [499 words]M. ToveyJan 30, 2012 13:29192482

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)