69 million page views

"Right" genocides (i.e. by friends) vs. "wrong" genocides (i.e. by enemies)

Reader comment on item: Anarchy, the New Threat
in response to reader comment: no government yet no anarchy in Belgium

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Feb 1, 2012 at 08:24

Myth wrote :

> What is the ingredient in the countries from Afghanistan over to Libya and on to Mexico that accounts for chaos?<

Evidently, a powerful third party is needed, very interested in destabilizing a region, providing arms, ammunition (and sometimes NATO air forces), money and propaganda for a given party or parties chosen to serve as the tool to carry out the policy of destabilization.

Note how careful the Western, especially the official US media and think tanks that are so vocal in condemning and meticulously enumerating the number of victims of "communist genocides" tend to circumvent or play down irksome topics like the Armenian genocide because it might offend a strategic "ally" that alas happens to have a copious and consistent genocidal record. But genocides by this "ally" and those alike him are "constructive genocides", so who will bother in Washington to ever recognize them, let alone to bring this staunch anti-communist "ally" to justice? Suharto's massacres are another good example of how "constructive" genocide perpetrated by a friend remains conveniently swept under the carpet because it has served a given political agenda nobody in official places will question.

Last not least , no one in the West has ever had the slightest scruples whatsoever about doing business with those they were denouncing as responsible for genocide. After the overthrow of the Khmer Rouge by the Vietnamese the US and the UK actively supported Pol Pot. Because of American and British pressure, the Khmer Rouge retained the Cambodian seat in the United Nations for many years after Pol Pot had been ousted from power.The same applies for the US friendship with comrade Mao despite the latter's genocidal record. Genocide seems to be bad as long as your enemy perpetrates it. Friendly genocides are consider much more liberally.

The notion of "genocide" has degenerated in the West to become a propaganda weapon to beat political opponents with. Political friends may commit genocides and nobody will in earnest blame them or persecute them. Sad to see how low the so called Western moral standards have sunk.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (29) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
anarchy in Colorado [42 words]Colorado CapitalistJul 23, 2012 12:06197378
1Holocaust Ignored :: Murder of 4,9 million Hindus in Bangladesh. [46 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ram OhriJul 19, 2012 00:14197303
The Rebellion of Anarchy is Not New. [570 words]M. ToveyFeb 6, 2012 14:26193143
yes [120 words]grefFeb 27, 2012 13:21193143
A bloody era [170 words]Peter HerzFeb 4, 2012 19:04193069
Oops! [52 words]Peter HerzFeb 5, 2012 19:02193069
3"The deeper issue" [347 words]IanusFeb 7, 2012 19:28193069
Seeds of Latent Anarchy in Scandinavia [425 words]M. ToveyFeb 8, 2012 13:46193069
Some thoughts on Roman and other Peace [109 words]Peter HerzFeb 8, 2012 20:36193069
2The rule of whose law ? [1136 words]IanusFeb 9, 2012 02:00193069
3The golden age [288 words]IanusFeb 10, 2012 05:21193069
1The Law of the Common Good [595 words]M. ToveyFeb 10, 2012 12:20193069
2Process of anarchization [123 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Anne de MandevilleFeb 3, 2012 04:16193015
Interesting Observation [64 words]AsifFeb 2, 2012 17:42192986
3Who's interested in anarchy? [876 words]IanusFeb 4, 2012 09:20192986
Intuitive Feeling [64 words]Asif WaziriFeb 2, 2012 15:18192984
What does this mean? [11 words]SonnyMar 13, 2012 04:55192984
feeling [116 words]AsifMar 14, 2012 12:46192984
All of your examples were of Islamists [86 words]sonnyMar 14, 2012 18:49192984
Other places [52 words]AsifMar 15, 2012 16:06192984
Is this really so different than the past? [132 words]sonnyMar 15, 2012 17:59192984
In terms of democide, these are small [13 words]bernardJan 31, 2012 19:09192939
1Communism still tops list but ... [127 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jason PappasJan 29, 2012 07:46192884
1no government yet no anarchy in Belgium [66 words]mythJan 29, 2012 03:21192883
6"Right" genocides (i.e. by friends) vs. "wrong" genocides (i.e. by enemies) [347 words]IanusFeb 1, 2012 08:24192883
So, it's all America's fault? [486 words]Kepha HorFeb 4, 2012 19:33192883
4Wrong forum ? [128 words]IanusFeb 5, 2012 02:14192883
why not interconnected? [51 words]Kepha HorFeb 5, 2012 19:00192883
2A modest dream [257 words]IanusFeb 6, 2012 09:03192883

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)